Labour Lens

Lacks transparency. Shows little about where or how its products are made.

Last researched 3 November 2026 · 4 sources

Melbourne-founded maker of home security cameras.

We couldn't find where Swann makes most of its home security cameras and recorders, a certification covering its range or a list of its suppliers.

Also worth knowing

Most electronics are made in countries such as China and Vietnam, where pay is usually below a living wage.

Other TV and audio brands

Nothing we've rated in TV and audio is better than Lacks transparency yet.

See every TV and audio brand

Know something we've missed? Send evidence. Represent Swann? Send a right of reply.

Compare Swann with another brand

Why it's graded Lacks transparency

  • Not met: Meets 1 of 6 Good requirements.
  • Holds the grade back: It has 3 red flags: no evidence of a living wage, unaudited production, probably in high-risk countries and untraced high-risk mined materials. Two or more red flags means a poor grade.
  • It isn't Harm on record, because there's no serious confirmed problem on its record.
  • Lacks transparency is still a poor grade: in supply chains like this, workers who can't be seen to be treated fairly are usually underpaid or unprotected.

How grades are decided


Good requirements 1 of 6

  • Not met: Pays a living wage, or holds a strong fair-pay certificationLiving wage: no evidence
  • Not met: Respects worker rightsWhere electronics are usually made, such as China and Malaysia, unions are heavily restricted, and it has no full supply chain audit.
  • Not met: Supply chain independently audited or certified, or at least 80% made in countries with strong labour standards
  • Met: No child or forced labour findings or links
  • Not met: Names the factories or farms that make its products, or is fully certified by a scheme that holds and audits that list
  • Not met: Traces its cobalt, gold and other conflict minerals to the mine

Red flags 3

  • Red flag: No evidence it pays a living wage
  • Red flag: Probably made mostly in countries with poor worker rights, without a full independent audit of its supply chain
  • Red flag: Relies on high-risk mined materials it can't traceShown to explain the grade. It isn't one of the 2 red flags that set it.
  • Red flag: Fails its category's raw-material check (means Lacks transparency)

Stars it would earn as Good

None yet. Stars only show on Good companies. About stars

Where it's made

Not confirmed

We couldn't confirm where Swann makes most of its products, so this shows where electronics are usually made.

Where it's made, share by country, and conditions there
CountryShareWorker rightsLegal minimum wageForced labour risk
China55%No guarantee of rightsBelow a living wageModerate
Vietnam15%Systematic violationsWell below a living wageModerate
Taiwan10%Strong protectionsClose to a living wageLow
Malaysia8%No guarantee of rightsBelow a living wageModerate
South Korea7%No guarantee of rightsClose to a living wageLow
India5%No guarantee of rightsWell below a living wageHigh

Evidence

What we found

  • Risk across the industry, not a finding about this company: cobalt, tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold mining carry child and forced labour risk (DR Congo, Indonesia), and assembly overtime is widespread.
  • Relies on metals such as cobalt, gold and tin from artisanal mines where miners, including children, face toxic dust, mercury exposure and deadly tunnel collapses. It hasn't shown any steps to trace these materials to the mine, so it's graded Lacks transparency until it does.

Research notes Swann's products are made by contract manufacturers; it has said it uses multiple suppliers in multiple countries and moved its top-end products to suppliers outside China, after dropping Chinese maker Raysharp in 2024. It names no factories or countries and publishes no supplier code, audit results, modern slavery statement or conflict minerals information.

What independent sources say

SourceResultDetails
Australian Modern Slavery RegisterUnclearNo Swann statement on the Australian Modern Slavery Register; it may fall below the A$100 million reporting threshold. View
KnowTheChainNot coveredNot among the large companies assessed in the 2025 KnowTheChain ICT benchmark. View

Sources and actions

Sources 4

Show all 4 sources
  1. Modern Slavery Register search: swann · search the archive · No Swann statement on the Australian register
  2. Swann dumps Chinese supplier after US ban (ChannelNews, Dec 2024) · search the archive · Swann dropped supplier Raysharp; uses multiple suppliers in multiple countries; top-end products moved outside China
  3. Swann, from Melbourne garage to $90m American buyout (TechPartner News, 2014) · search the archive · Founded in Melbourne in 1987; acquired by Chinese surveillance maker Infinova in 2014
  4. Swann releases indoor/outdoor cameras (ChannelNews, 2019) · search the archive · Sold at JB Hi-Fi, Harvey Norman, Bunnings, Jaycar and Officeworks

Company details

Headquarters
Australia
Last researched
3 November 2026
Cite this page
Labour Lens, "Is Swann ethical? Labour rating", https://www.labourlens.net/brand/swann, last researched 3 November 2026, accessed [date].
Method
Researched with AI assistance against published rules. How we check · What Lacks transparency means

Something missing or wrong?

Grades are opinions based on the evidence listed here. Send us evidence, or a right of reply if you represent Swann.