Labour Lens

Sapphire Technology

Lacks transparency

Lacks transparency. Publishes some details, but doesn't show its workers are paid and treated fairly.

Last researched 3 November 2026 · 6 sources

Hong Kong maker of AMD Radeon graphics cards.

There's no proof Sapphire Technology pays more than the legal minimum, which in China is below a living wage, and it has no full independent audit.

Know something we've missed? Send evidence. Represent Sapphire Technology? Send a right of reply.

Compare Sapphire Technology with another brand

Why it's graded Lacks transparency

  • Not met: Meets 1 of 6 Good requirements.
  • Holds the grade back: It has 3 red flags: no evidence of a living wage, a hidden, unaudited supply chain in high-risk countries and untraced high-risk mined materials. Two or more red flags means a poor grade.
  • It isn't Harm on record, because there's no serious confirmed problem on its record.
  • Lacks transparency is still a poor grade: in supply chains like this, workers who can't be seen to be treated fairly are usually underpaid or unprotected.

How grades are decided


Good requirements 1 of 6

  • Not met: Pays a living wage, or holds a strong fair-pay certificationLiving wage: no evidence
  • Not met: Respects worker rightsMost of its products are made in countries such as China and Malaysia, where unions are heavily restricted, and it has no full supply chain audit.
  • Not met: Supply chain independently audited or certified, or at least 80% made in countries with strong labour standards
  • Met: No child or forced labour findings or links
  • Not met: Names the factories or farms that make its products, or is fully certified by a scheme that holds and audits that list
  • Not met: Traces its cobalt, gold and other conflict minerals to the mine

Red flags 3

  • Red flag: No evidence it pays a living wage
  • Red flag: Hidden supply chain, mostly in countries with poor worker rights
  • Red flag: Relies on high-risk mined materials it can't traceShown to explain the grade. It isn't one of the 2 red flags that set it.
  • Red flag: Fails its category's raw-material check (means Lacks transparency)

Stars it would earn as Good

None yet. Stars only show on Good companies. About stars

Where it's made

Sapphire Technology names some of the countries it makes in: China. The rest is shown as where electronics are usually made.

Where it's made, and conditions there
CountryWorker rightsLegal minimum wageForced labour risk
ChinaNo guarantee of rightsBelow a living wageModerate
VietnamUsual for the industrySystematic violationsWell below a living wageModerate
TaiwanUsual for the industryStrong protectionsClose to a living wageLow
MalaysiaUsual for the industryNo guarantee of rightsBelow a living wageModerate
South KoreaUsual for the industryNo guarantee of rightsClose to a living wageLow
IndiaUsual for the industryNo guarantee of rightsWell below a living wageHigh

Evidence

What we found

  • Risk across the industry, not a finding about this company: cobalt, tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold mining carry child and forced labour risk (DR Congo, Indonesia), and assembly overtime is widespread.
  • Relies on metals such as cobalt, gold and tin from artisanal mines where miners, including children, face toxic dust, mercury exposure and deadly tunnel collapses. It hasn't shown any steps to trace these materials to the mine, so it's graded Lacks transparency until it does.

Research notes Sapphire cards are assembled in Dongguan, China by PC Partner, the contract manufacturer that owns ZOTAC; Sapphire says it has no financial or legal ties to PC Partner or ZOTAC. Whether any Sapphire cards come from PC Partner's newer Batam, Indonesia plant is not stated. Sapphire publishes no supplier list, code of conduct, audits, smelter list or wage data. No labour abuse reports were found.

What independent sources say

SourceResultDetails
Baptist World Aid Ethical Fashion ReportNot coveredNot rated: Baptist World Aid's Electronics Industry Report ended in 2016 and never assessed this company. View
KnowTheChainNot listedNot among the 45 companies in the 2025 KnowTheChain ICT benchmark. View

Sources and actions

Sources 6

Show all 6 sources
  1. Sapphire distanziert sich von Zotac (ChannelPartner, 2007) · search the archive · Sapphire is privately run, has no financial or legal ties to ZOTAC and uses only PC Partner to make its cards
  2. PC Partner prepares to float (KitGuru, 2010) · search the archive · Sapphire cards are assembled by PC Partner in Dongguan
  3. How a graphics card is built (PCGamesN) · search the archive · PC Partner's Dongguan factory makes products for Sapphire
  4. Sapphire at Umart · search the archive · Umart, which has Australian stores, sells Sapphire products
  5. TechPowerUp: Sapphire factory tour · search the archive · Privately held, founded June 2001, HQ Hong Kong; cards made at Sapphire's factory near Dongguan, China

Published by Sapphire Technology or its owner

  1. PC Partner Group Sustainability Report 2025 · search the archive · Dongguan 97.5% and Indonesia 2.5% of production cost; 2,979 staff; internal audits to RBA standards; no wage levels given

Company details

Headquarters
China
Last researched
3 November 2026
Cite this page
Labour Lens, "Is Sapphire Technology ethical? Labour rating", https://www.labourlens.net/brand/sapphire-technology, last researched 3 November 2026, accessed [date].
Method
Researched with AI assistance against published rules. How we check · What Lacks transparency means

Better-graded laptops and computers

Something missing or wrong?

Grades are opinions based on the evidence listed here. Send us evidence, or a right of reply if you represent Sapphire Technology.