ME+EM
Lacks transparency. Publishes some details, but doesn't show its workers are paid and treated fairly.
Last researched 3 November 2026 · 3 sources
London premium fashion label selling womenswear.
There's no proof ME+EM pays more than the legal minimum, which in Türkiye and China is below a living wage.
Know something we've missed? Send evidence. Represent ME+EM? Send a right of reply.
Compare ME+EM with another brand
Why it's graded Lacks transparency
- Not met: Meets 3 of 6 Good requirements.
- Holds the grade back: It doesn't show that workers are paid a living wage, and isn't certified as working towards one. On Track needs at least one of these.
- It isn't Harm on record, because there's no serious confirmed problem on its record.
- Lacks transparency is still a poor grade: in supply chains like this, workers who can't be seen to be treated fairly are usually underpaid or unprotected.
Good requirements 3 of 6
- Not met: Pays a living wage, or holds a strong fair-pay certificationLiving wage: no evidence
- Met: Respects worker rights
- Met: Supply chain independently audited or certified, or at least 80% made in countries with strong labour standards
- Met: No child or forced labour findings or links
- Not met: Names the factories or farms that make its products, or is fully certified by a scheme that holds and audits that list
- Not met: High-risk raw materials (cotton, leather and cashmere) traced or certified, or not a major part of its rangeNot traced or certified: cotton
Red flags 1
- Red flag: No evidence it pays a living wage
Stars it would earn as Good
None yet. Stars only show on Good companies. About stars
Where it's made
ME+EM says which countries it makes its products in, but doesn't name the factories.
| Country | Worker rights | Legal minimum wage | Forced labour risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Türkiye | No guarantee of rights | Below a living wage | Very high |
| Portugal | Strong protections | Close to a living wage | Low |
| Italy | Strong protections | Close to a living wage | Low |
| China | No guarantee of rights | Below a living wage | Moderate |
| India | No guarantee of rights | Well below a living wage | High |
| Spain | Strong protections | Close to a living wage | Low |
| Romania | Regular violations | Below a living wage | Moderate |
| Mauritius | Regular violations | Below a living wage | Low |
| United Kingdom | Regular violations | Close to a living wage | Low |
| Germany | Strong protections | About a living wage | Low |
| Bulgaria | Regular violations | Below a living wage | High |
| Nepal | Regular violations | Below a living wage | Low |
Evidence
What we found
- Modern slavery statement
- Independent social audits of all its main factories
- Doesn't show where its cotton comes from. Cotton is linked to forced labour in Xinjiang and Turkmenistan, and child labour in several growing regions, so it can't be graded Good until it traces or certifies it.
- Uses leather and cashmere in only a few products and doesn't show where they come from. That doesn't count against it for Good, but the "Open supply chain" star needs all of them traced, certified or upcycled.
Research notes ME+EM's clothing, footwear and accessories come from 60 suppliers running 73 tier 1 factories in 14 countries, with the most sites in Turkey, Portugal, Italy and China; it gives site counts by country but no production shares and no named supplier list. It is an ETI member, requires SMETA audits (98% of suppliers audited) and bans cotton from Xinjiang, Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan. It is an accredited Living Wage Employer for its own staff but has no supply-chain living wage commitment; a wage gap assessment of its top manufacturers is planned for 2026-27.
What independent sources say
| Source | Result | Details |
|---|---|---|
| UK Modern Slavery Statement Registry | Listed | 2025-26 UK modern slavery statement lists 73 tier 1 factories from 60 suppliers in 14 countries, 98% of suppliers with SMETA audits, and a living wage gap assessment of top suppliers planned for 2026-27. View |
| Baptist World Aid Ethical Fashion Report | Not listed | Not rated in the 2026 Ethical Fashion Report. View |
Sources and actions
Sources 3
Show all 3 sources
- Ethical Fashion Guide (Baptist World Aid, 2026 edition) · search the archive · 11th edition (2026); ME+EM not among the rated brands
Published by ME+EM or its owner
- ME+EM Modern Slavery Statement 2025-26 · search the archive · 73 tier 1 factories from 60 suppliers in 14 countries (Turkey 16 sites, Portugal 14, China 15, Italy 11, India 6 and others); 98% SMETA; ETI; living wage gap assessment planned 2026-27
- ME+EM - International customers · search the archive · Ships to over 200 destinations via Global-E; Australia listed among countries where ME+EM covers duties and taxes
Company details
- Headquarters
- United Kingdom
- Last researched
- 3 November 2026
- Cite this page
- Labour Lens, "Is ME+EM ethical? Labour rating", https://www.labourlens.net/brand/me-em, last researched 3 November 2026, accessed [date].
- Method
- Researched with AI assistance against published rules. How we check · What Lacks transparency means
Better-graded everyday fashion
None of the everyday fashion brands we know to make knitwear is Good yet. These are the strongest so far. The Social Studio, Middlemost and The Social Outfit are Good, but we don't know that they make knitwear. Second-hand and refurbished goods create no new factory work, so they're Good by rule and come first.
Something missing or wrong?
Grades are opinions based on the evidence listed here. Send us evidence, or a right of reply if you represent ME+EM.