Labour Lens
Clothing & footwear · Fast fashion clothing retailer

H&M

Partly verified

H&M raises serious concerns: there are reports of forced or child labour in its supply chain, and there are documented abuses of workers. In 2021 Jeyasre Kathiravel, a worker at H&M supplier Natchi Apparel in Dindigul, India, was murdered after reported sexual harassment by her supervisor; H&M then signed the binding Dindigul Agreement on gender-based violence in 2022 (British Safety Council India, 2022).

Last researched 7 October 2026

Not doing enough. Workers in the supply chain are likely underpaid, unprotected or in danger, and in the worst cases face forced or child labour. Look for a better-graded alternative. What this grade means

Send evidenceRepresent H&M? Reply here

Good: 2 of 5

  • Pays a living wage
  • Respects worker rights
  • Full supply chain audit, or made only in countries with rigorous labour standards
  • No child or forced labour findings
  • Publishes where its products are made (supplier list, named farms or its own factories)

Great: 1 of 3

  • Pays beyond a living wage
  • Finds and fixes problems, or invests directly in workers' communities
  • Actively empowers workers

Needs all Good requirements plus two of these.

Red flags: 3

  • Does not pay a living wage
  • Clear breaches of labour conditions
  • Instances of forced, slave or child labour

Where it's made

CountryWorker rightsLegal wagesForced labour risk
China 30%Systematic violationsBelow a living wageModerate
Bangladesh 25%No guarantee of rightsFar below a living wageHigh
Türkiye 10%No guarantee of rightsBelow a living wageVery high
India 10%Systematic violationsWell below a living wageHigh
Vietnam 7%Systematic violationsWell below a living wageModerate
Cambodia 6%Systematic violationsFar below a living wageModerate
Indonesia 5%Systematic violationsWell below a living wageModerate
Pakistan 4%Systematic violationsFar below a living wageHigh
Portugal 2%Strong protectionsBelow a living wageLow
Morocco 1%Regular violationsWell below a living wageModerate

Country conditions from the ITUC Global Rights Index, Global Slavery Index and living wage benchmarks. Certifications and audits can raise a company above its countries' baseline.

Why this grade

  • Cotton is linked to forced labour (Xinjiang, Turkmenistan) and child labour in several growing regions.
  • Publishes supplier list
  • Signed the International Accord on garment factory safety
  • Modern slavery statement
  • Actively empowers workers (ownership, worker committees, union agreements, training)
  • Independent social audits of all its main factories

H&M publishes a supplier list updated quarterly, covering about 800 apparel factories in 23 countries, with China and Bangladesh the largest production markets; it does not disclose production volumes by country. It has union agreements with IndustriALL, takes part in the ACT living wage initiative and has signed the International Accord, but has no time-bound living wage target and publishes average wages only against minimum wages. It announced a phase-out of sourcing from Myanmar in August 2023, and its 2025 reporting and a 2026 analysis of its supplier list do not mention Myanmar.

What independent sources say

SourceResultDetails
Baptist World Aid Ethical Fashion ReportFoundScored 57 out of 100 in the 2024 Ethical Fashion Report, in the top fifth of brands assessed. View ↗
Fashion Transparency Index (Fashion Revolution)FoundScored 71% in the 2023 Fashion Transparency Index, one of the highest scores. View ↗
KnowTheChainFoundScored 49 out of 100 in the 2023 KnowTheChain apparel and footwear benchmark. View ↗
Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (World Benchmarking Alliance)FoundScored 61.3 out of 100 in the Corporate Human Rights Benchmark. View ↗
Australian Modern Slavery RegisterFoundThe 2025 H&M Group modern slavery statement covers H&M Australia. View ↗
UK Modern Slavery Statement RegistryFoundThe 2025 H&M Group modern slavery statement covers its UK entities. View ↗
Business & Human Rights Resource CentreFoundRecords 20 cases of abuse at H&M suppliers in Myanmar (2022-23) and H&M's responses, among other allegations. View ↗
Open Supply HubUnclearH&M publishes a quarterly list of its supplier factories, which can be mapped on Open Supply Hub. View ↗

Confirmed issues

Problems confirmed by a court, regulator, completed investigation or the company itself. Issues more than 15 years old, or 10–15 years old where the company made amends, are removed. Problems a company finds and publishes itself, and is fixing, are shown but don't count against it.

WhenWhat happenedMade amends?
2025H&M's own 2025 modern slavery statement reports 10 cases of workers paying recruitment fees at suppliers in 2025 and 8 in 2024, mainly small fees for medical checks or notary costs.Not known
2023The Business & Human Rights Resource Centre documented 20 cases of abuse at H&M suppliers in Myanmar between February 2022 and February 2023, including wage theft, unfair dismissal and forced overtime; H&M followed up and later said all but one were resolved (Al Jazeera, 2023; BHRRC, 2024).Partly
Says all but one case were resolved.
2021In 2021 Jeyasre Kathiravel, a worker at H&M supplier Natchi Apparel in Dindigul, India, was murdered after reported sexual harassment by her supervisor; H&M then signed the binding Dindigul Agreement on gender-based violence in 2022 (British Safety Council India, 2022).Yes
Signed the binding Dindigul Agreement on gender-based violence in 2022.
2019H&M's 2013 pledge of a fair living wage for 850,000 workers by 2018 was not met; the Clean Clothes Campaign found no evidence that any worker making its clothes was paid a living wage (Clean Clothes Campaign, 2019).No
No living wage shown across its supply chain.

Unconfirmed reports

Credible reports that haven't been confirmed by a regulator, completed investigation or the company. They're shown for your information and don't affect the grade.

  • A 2020 think-tank report linked H&M to a Chinese yarn maker using Xinjiang labour transfers; H&M said it found no indication of forced labour but ended the indirect relationship and stopped Xinjiang cotton sourcing (The Local, 2020). Source ↗
  • The Clean Clothes Campaign reported wage theft, higher production targets and harassment at H&M suppliers in Bangladesh, Cambodia and Indonesia during the pandemic; H&M said workers were paid according to local law. Source ↗
Owned by
H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB
Headquarters
Sweden
Employees
About 132,000

Sources (12)

Last researched 7 October 2026 · details still being verified. Grades are opinions based on the evidence listed here. Represent this company and think something is wrong? A right-of-reply form is coming soon.