Labour Lens

Lacks transparency. Publishes some details, but doesn't show its workers are paid and treated fairly.

Last researched 2 November 2026 · 5 sources

Family-owned Bologna company selling leather handbags and accessories.

Furla publishes no supplier list or independent audits, which Italian fashion needs before we presume a living wage, because Milan prosecutors have found luxury brands' subcontractors exploiting migrant workers.

Why it's graded Lacks transparency

  • Not met: Meets 1 of 6 Good requirements.
  • Holds the grade back: It has 2 red flags: no evidence of a living wage and a hidden, unaudited supply chain in high-risk countries. Two or more red flags means a poor grade.
  • It isn't Harm on record, because there's no serious confirmed problem on its record.
  • Lacks transparency is still a poor grade: in supply chains like this, workers who can't be seen to be treated fairly are usually underpaid or unprotected.

How grades are decided


Good requirements 1 of 6

  • Not met: Pays a living wage, or holds a strong fair-pay certificationLiving wage: no evidence
  • Not met: Respects worker rightsMost of its products are made in countries such as China and Bangladesh, where unions are heavily restricted, and it has no full supply chain audit.
  • Not met: Supply chain independently audited or certified, or at least 80% made in countries with strong labour standards
  • Met: No child or forced labour findings or links
  • Not met: Names the factories or farms that make its products, or is fully certified by a scheme that holds and audits that list
  • Not met: High-risk raw materials (cotton and leather) traced or certified, or not a major part of its rangeNot traced or certified: leather

Red flags 2

  • Red flag: No evidence it pays a living wage
  • Red flag: Hidden supply chain, mostly in countries with poor worker rights

Stars it would earn as Good

None yet. Stars only show on Good companies. About stars

Where it's made

Furla names some of the countries it makes in: Italy. The rest is shown as where clothes and shoes are usually made.

Where it's made, and conditions there
CountryWorker rightsLegal minimum wageForced labour risk
ItalyStrong protectionsClose to a living wageLow
ChinaUsual for the industryNo guarantee of rightsBelow a living wageModerate
BangladeshUsual for the industryNo guarantee of rightsFar below a living wageModerate
VietnamUsual for the industrySystematic violationsWell below a living wageModerate
IndiaUsual for the industryNo guarantee of rightsWell below a living wageHigh
CambodiaUsual for the industryNo guarantee of rightsFar below a living wageModerate
TürkiyeUsual for the industryNo guarantee of rightsBelow a living wageVery high
IndonesiaUsual for the industryNo guarantee of rightsWell below a living wageModerate
PakistanUsual for the industryNo guarantee of rightsFar below a living wageHigh

Evidence

What we found

  • Being made in Italy doesn't count towards a living wage or audit here: Italian fashion and leather goods, where Milan prosecutors have found luxury brands' subcontractors exploiting migrant workers. It would need to publish its suppliers or have them independently audited.
  • Doesn't show where its leather comes from. Leather is linked to hazardous tannery work and forced labour on some cattle ranches, so it can't be graded Good until it traces or certifies it.
  • Uses cotton in only a few products and doesn't show where it comes from. That doesn't count against it for Good, but the "Open supply chain" star needs all of it traced, certified or upcycled.

Research notes Furla owns a leather goods workshop in Barberino Tavarnelle, Tuscany (Effeuno, bought in 2018, with around 130 to 250 staff), which handles key production steps, so Italy is shown from its one named site; it does not say how much of its range is made there, which other suppliers or countries make its bags, or whether they are audited. It publishes no supplier list, no modern slavery statement and no living wage commitment. It says a growing share of leather in its direct production is LWG or ICEC certified, without giving figures.

What independent sources say

SourceResultDetails
Fashion Transparency Index (Fashion Revolution)ListedScored 11.8 out of 250 (about 5%) in the 2023 Fashion Transparency Index, down from 25.5 in 2020. View
Business & Human Rights Resource CentreListedCompany profile lists no labour abuse allegations against Furla or its suppliers. View

Sources and actions

Sources 5

Show all 5 sources
  1. Furla company profile (BHRRC) · search the archive · Fashion Transparency Index scores 2019-2023 (11.8/250 in 2023); no allegations listed
  2. Furla (Good On You directory) · search the archive · Insufficient information on actions affecting people in its supply chain
  3. Furla adquiere al fabricante de bolsos Effeuno (Modaes, 2018) · search the archive · Furla took full control of Tuscan leather bag maker Effeuno; Furla makes about 2.5 million bags a year
  4. Furla Progetto Italia is ready: production, academy and 250 employees (La Conceria) · search the archive · Tuscan production hub opened 2021 with 130 staff, 250 planned; Effeuno handles delicate production phases

Published by Furla or its owner

  1. Furla Responsibility · search the archive · Growing use of LWG and ICEC certified leather in direct production; no share, supplier or audit data given

Company details

Headquarters
Italy
Last researched
2 November 2026
Cite this page
Labour Lens, "Is Furla ethical? Labour rating", https://www.labourlens.net/brand/furla, last researched 2 November 2026, accessed [date].
Method
Researched with AI assistance against published rules. How we check · What Lacks transparency means

Something missing or wrong?

Grades are opinions based on the evidence listed here. Send us evidence, or a right of reply if you represent Furla.