Labour Lens
Electronics · Modular, repairable smartphones and earbuds

Fairphone

Partly verified

✓ Checks its own supply chain. Fairphone actively looks for problems such as child or forced labour, publishes what it finds and works to fix it. That openness is uncommon, so problems it finds and reports itself are shown below but don't count against its grade.

Fairphone is working towards a living wage through living wages it can already prove for part of its supply chain, with no serious warning signs. It just can't yet prove workers earn one.

Last researched 8 October 2026

Heading in the right direction. Workers are paid enough to live on, or the company is certified as working towards it, and there are no serious warning signs. One piece is still unproven. What this grade means

Send evidenceRepresent Fairphone? Reply here

Good: 3 of 5

  • Pays a living wage
  • Respects worker rights
  • Full supply chain audit, or made only in countries with rigorous labour standards
  • No child or forced labour findings
  • Publishes where its products are made (supplier list, named farms or its own factories)

Great: 2 of 3

  • Pays beyond a living wage
  • Finds and fixes problems, or invests directly in workers' communities
  • Actively empowers workers

Needs all Good requirements plus two of these.

Red flags: 0

None found.

Where it's made

CountryWorker rightsLegal wagesForced labour risk
ChinaSystematic violationsBelow a living wageModerate

Country conditions from the ITUC Global Rights Index, Global Slavery Index and living wage benchmarks. Certifications and audits can raise a company above its countries' baseline.

Why this grade

  • Cobalt, tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold mining carry child and forced labour risk (DR Congo, Indonesia), and assembly overtime is widespread. (partly offset by certification or direct sourcing)
  • Certified B Corp: Whole-company assessment. Labour is one part of the score, so it is supportive rather than proof.
  • Conflict-free minerals programme: Responsible sourcing for tin, tantalum, tungsten, gold or cobalt.
  • Publishes supplier list
  • Proves a living wage for part of its supply chain only
  • Uses recycled metals or fibres
  • Invests in worker and farming communities
  • Actively empowers workers (ownership, worker committees, union agreements, training)
  • Independent social audits of all its main factories

Fairphone's phones are assembled in China: its supplier list names Huizhou TCL Mobile Communication in Guangdong as the final assembler of the Fairphone 4 and 5, and Fairphone says this factory holds SA8000 certification, an independently audited social standard, while its earbud assembler in Dongguan is audited against BSCI. Independent social audits are rare further down the chain: only 8 of 116 listed component suppliers (7%) had SA8000, RBA or BSCI-type audits in 2024, and Fairphone does not say which key component suppliers are audited. Its Living Wage Bonus tops up pay for hours worked on Fairphone production at its final assembly factory and several key suppliers ($215,000 to 1,650 workers at five factories in 2025), but there is no dated target for a full living wage, and because F

What independent sources say

SourceResultDetails
B Corp directoryFoundCertified B Corp since April 2015 with an overall score of 136.8 (Workers 26.1). View ↗
Fairtrade (incl. FLOCERT and Fairtrade ANZ)UnclearFairphone uses Fairtrade gold in some components of the Gen. 6, but most of its gold, silver and cobalt is covered by Fairmined credits; its phones are not Fairtrade certified products. View ↗
US Department of Labor goods listsUnclearThe DOL list includes cobalt ore, a material used in phone batteries, among its listed goods; it does not name individual companies. View ↗
UK Modern Slavery Statement RegistryUnclearNo UK modern slavery statement from Fairphone was confirmed. View ↗
Australian Modern Slavery RegisterUnclearNo Australian modern slavery statement from Fairphone was confirmed. View ↗
Business & Human Rights Resource CentreNot listedNo allegations against Fairphone were found. View ↗

Confirmed issues

Problems confirmed by a court, regulator, completed investigation or the company itself. Issues more than 15 years old, or 10–15 years old where the company made amends, are removed. Problems a company finds and publishes itself, and is fixing, are shown but don't count against it.

WhenWhat happenedMade amends?
2016A social assessment commissioned by Fairphone found weekly hours of up to 77 and stretches of up to 31 days without a rest day at its Fairphone 2 assembler Hi-P in Suzhou in 2014-2015, with some excess hours still recorded in April 2016.
Found and being fixed by the company Not counted against the grade, because the company found and published it itself.
Partly
Hi-P introduced a working-hours control system and a 60-hour weekly cap from August 2015; Fairphone committed to better production forecasts, but by April 2016 some workers still exceeded 60 hours or
Headquarters
Netherlands

Sources (12)

Last researched 8 October 2026 · details still being verified. Grades are opinions based on the evidence listed here. Represent this company and think something is wrong? A right-of-reply form is coming soon.