Labour Lens

Corsair

Lacks transparency

Lacks transparency. Publishes some details, but doesn't show its workers are paid and treated fairly.

Electronics

Partly verified: what this means

Last researched 3 November 2026 · 3 sources

US company selling PC components, gaming keyboards and headsets.

Until Corsair traces its cobalt, gold and tin to the mine, it can't show that the miners who dig them are safe or fairly paid.

See better laptops and computers options

Know something we've missed? Send evidence. Represent Corsair? Send a right of reply.

Compare Corsair with another brand

Why it's graded Lacks transparency

  • Not met: Meets 1 of 6 Good requirements.
  • Holds the grade back: It relies on high-risk mined materials it can't trace. That alone means a poor grade until it takes steps to trace them.
  • It isn't Harm on record, because there's no serious confirmed problem on its record.
  • Lacks transparency is still a poor grade: in supply chains like this, workers who can't be seen to be treated fairly are usually underpaid or unprotected.

How grades are decided

Good requirements 1 of 6

  • Not met: Pays a living wage, or holds a strong fair-pay certificationLiving wage: no evidence
  • Not met: Respects worker rightsSome of its products are made in China, where unions are heavily restricted, and it has no full supply chain audit.
  • Not met: Supply chain independently audited or certified, or at least 80% made in countries with strong labour standards
  • Met: No child or forced labour findings or links
  • Not met: Names the factories or farms that make its products, or is fully certified by a scheme that holds and audits that list
  • Not met: Traces its cobalt, gold and other conflict minerals to the mine

Red flags 3

  • Red flag: No evidence it pays a living wage
  • Red flag: Made partly in countries with poor worker rights, without a full independent audit of its supply chain
  • Red flag: Relies on high-risk mined materials it can't trace
  • Red flag: Fails its category's raw-material check (means Lacks transparency)

Stars it would earn as Good

None yet. Stars only show on Good companies. About stars

Where it's made

Corsair says which countries it makes its products in, but doesn't name the factories.

Where it's made, and conditions there
CountryWorker rightsLegal minimum wageForced labour risk
TaiwanStrong protectionsClose to a living wageLow
ChinaNo guarantee of rightsBelow a living wageModerate
VietnamSystematic violationsWell below a living wageModerate

Evidence

What we found

  • Risk across the industry, not a finding about this company: cobalt, tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold mining carry child and forced labour risk (DR Congo, Indonesia), and assembly overtime is widespread.
  • Modern slavery statement
  • Makes part of its range in its own factories
  • Relies on metals such as cobalt, gold and tin from artisanal mines where miners, including children, face toxic dust, mercury exposure and deadly tunnel collapses. It hasn't shown any steps to trace these materials to the mine, so it's graded Lacks transparency until it does.

Research notes Corsair assembles nearly all its DRAM memory and a significant share of its controllers and liquid coolers at its own facility in Taiwan, builds some PCs in Atlanta, US, and has all other products made by third-party factories in Asia; it names Taiwan, China and Vietnam but gives no shares or supplier list. It requires direct suppliers to follow the RBA Code of Conduct and audits them, but is not an RBA member and publishes no audit results. There is no living wage commitment.

What independent sources say

SourceResultDetails
UK Modern Slavery Statement RegistryListedCorsair Gaming publishes a modern slavery statement under the UK and Australian Modern Slavery Acts (FY2024), reporting no cases found. View

Sources and actions

Sources 3

Show all 3 sources
  1. Corsair Gaming Form 10-K FY2025 (SEC) · search the archive · Own Taiwan facility makes nearly all DRAM, much of its controllers and coolers; others by third parties in Asia (Taiwan, China, Vietnam); 2,355 staff.

Published by Corsair or its owner

  1. Corsair Modern Slavery Statement (FY2024) · search the archive · UK and Australian MSA statement; direct suppliers must follow RBA Code; internal and third-party audits; no cases reported.
  2. Corsair supply chain disclosure · search the archive · Supplier contracts require compliance with the RBA Code of Conduct; no RBA membership or audit results published.

Company details

Headquarters
United States
Employees
About 2,355
Last researched
3 November 2026
Cite this page
Labour Lens, "Is Corsair ethical? Labour rating", https://www.labourlens.net/brand/corsair, last researched 3 November 2026, accessed [date].
Method
Researched with AI assistance against published rules. How we check · What Lacks transparency means

Better-graded laptops and computers

2 refurbished sellers, Good by ruleBuying second-hand or refurbished: Back Market and Reebelo · See them allGoodRaspberry PiMissing: a full independent supply chain audit, where its earlier stages happen and 2 more · ElectronicsLow-cost single-board computersPays or is working towards a living wage, with gaps still to close.On TrackPartly verified

No laptops and computers brand selling new goods is Good yet. This is the strongest so far. Second-hand and refurbished goods create no new factory work, so they're Good by rule and come first.

See every laptops and computers brand

Something missing or wrong?

Grades are opinions based on the evidence listed here. Send us evidence, or a right of reply if you represent Corsair.

Send evidenceSend a right of reply