Labour Lens
Electronics · Phones, laptops, tablets and wearables

Apple

Partly verified

✓ Checks its own supply chain. Apple actively looks for problems such as child or forced labour, publishes what it finds and works to fix it. That openness is uncommon, so problems it finds and reports itself are shown below but don't count against its grade.

Apple raises serious concerns: there are reports of forced or child labour in its supply chain. Apple's 2025 supplier assessments found core violations at three facilities, including two workers a few months under the legal working age of 16 and two cases of falsified working-hour records (Apple Supply Chain Progress Report, 2026).

Last researched 7 October 2026

Not doing enough. Workers in the supply chain are likely underpaid, unprotected or in danger, and in the worst cases face forced or child labour. Look for a better-graded alternative. What this grade means

Send evidenceRepresent Apple? Reply here

Good: 2 of 5

  • Pays a living wage
  • Respects worker rights
  • Full supply chain audit, or made only in countries with rigorous labour standards
  • No child or forced labour findings
  • Publishes where its products are made (supplier list, named farms or its own factories)

Great: 1 of 3

  • Pays beyond a living wage
  • Finds and fixes problems, or invests directly in workers' communities
  • Actively empowers workers

Needs all Good requirements plus two of these.

Red flags: 1

  • Instances of forced, slave or child labour

Where it's made

CountryWorker rightsLegal wagesForced labour risk
China 70%Systematic violationsBelow a living wageModerate
India 20%Systematic violationsWell below a living wageHigh
Vietnam 10%Systematic violationsWell below a living wageModerate

Country conditions from the ITUC Global Rights Index, Global Slavery Index and living wage benchmarks. Certifications and audits can raise a company above its countries' baseline.

Why this grade

  • Cobalt, tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold mining carry child and forced labour risk (DR Congo, Indonesia), and assembly overtime is widespread. (partly offset by certification or direct sourcing)
  • Responsible Business Alliance: Electronics industry code with third-party audits. Members set their own pace.
  • Conflict-free minerals programme: Responsible sourcing for tin, tantalum, tungsten, gold or cobalt.
  • Publishes supplier list
  • Modern slavery statement
  • Uses recycled metals or fibres
  • Uses high-risk raw materials (e.g. leather tanning, mica, artisanal gold)
  • Independent social audits of all its main factories
  • Reports child labour cases found and fixed

Apple publishes a supplier list, audits hundreds of suppliers a year and requires all its tin, tantalum, tungsten, gold, cobalt and lithium smelters to pass third-party audits. Since 2025 all Apple-designed batteries use 100% recycled cobalt and its circuit boards use recycled gold plating and tin solder, but gold elsewhere in its products is not fully recycled and it does not report mica sourcing at the same level. It makes no living wage commitment and scores low on purchasing practices and support for trade unions in the 2025 KnowTheChain benchmark.

What independent sources say

SourceResultDetails
KnowTheChainFoundScored 46/100 and ranked 5th of 45 companies in the 2025 KnowTheChain ICT benchmark, with low scores on purchasing practices, worker rights and remedy. View ↗
Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (World Benchmarking Alliance)FoundScored 31.6/100 in the 2022 Corporate Human Rights Benchmark. View ↗
Australian Modern Slavery RegisterFoundApple Pty Limited lodged a 2025 modern slavery statement covering July 2024 to June 2025. View ↗
UK Modern Slavery Statement RegistryFoundPublishes a UK Modern Slavery Act statement for its UK subsidiaries. View ↗
US Department of Labor goods listsFoundMaterials and products Apple uses appear on the US DOL list: cobalt from the DRC, mica from India and electronics from China and Malaysia. View ↗
US forced-labour import bans (UFLPA Entity List, CBP Withhold Release Orders)Not listedNeither Apple nor its major named suppliers appear on the UFLPA Entity List. View ↗
Business & Human Rights Resource CentreFoundTracks allegations including DR Congo's conflict-minerals complaints, which Paris prosecutors dismissed in 2025. View ↗

Confirmed issues

Problems confirmed by a court, regulator, completed investigation or the company itself. Issues more than 15 years old, or 10–15 years old where the company made amends, are removed. Problems a company finds and publishes itself, and is fixing, are shown but don't count against it.

WhenWhat happenedMade amends?
2025Apple's own supply chain reporting shows suppliers or labour agencies charged recruitment fees to more than 37,700 workers, with US$34.5 million repaid since 2008 (Apple Supply Chain Progress Report, 2026).
Found and being fixed by the company Not counted against the grade, because the company found and published it itself.
Yes
US$34.5 million in recruitment fees repaid to workers since 2008.
2025Apple's 2025 supplier assessments found core violations at three facilities, including two workers a few months under the legal working age of 16 and two cases of falsified working-hour records (Apple Supply Chain Progress Report, 2026).Not known
2022Apple and Foxconn acknowledged hiring lapses in 2022 at Foxconn's iPhone plant near Chennai, India, after a Reuters investigation found married women were being excluded from assembly jobs (Reuters, 2024).Not known

Unconfirmed reports

Credible reports that haven't been confirmed by a regulator, completed investigation or the company. They're shown for your information and don't affect the grade.

  • China Labor Watch reported that at Foxconn's Zhengzhou iPhone 17 plant over half the workforce were dispatch workers, most worked 60 to 75 hours a week, and workers who resigned early lost overtime pay (China Labor Watch, 2025). Source ↗
  • Reuters reported that Foxconn continued to exclude married women from iPhone assembly jobs in India in 2023 and 2024; Foxconn denies discrimination (Reuters, 2024). Source ↗
  • The Tech Transparency Project linked Apple touchscreen supplier Lens Technology to state-run transfers of Uyghur workers from Xinjiang, the fifth Apple supplier linked to the programme; Apple says Lens received no such transfers (Tech Transparency Project, 2021). Source ↗
  • The DR Congo government filed criminal complaints in France and Belgium alleging Apple's supply chain uses minerals from conflict zones; Paris prosecutors dropped the French case in 2025 while the Belgian investigation continues, and Apple denies the claims (Heise, 2025). Source ↗
  • International Rights Advocates sued Apple in Washington DC alleging its cobalt, tin, tantalum and tungsten are linked to child and forced labour in Congo; Apple calls the claims baseless (Engineering News, 2025). Source ↗
Headquarters
United States
Employees
About 166,000

Sources (12)

Last researched 7 October 2026 · details still being verified. Grades are opinions based on the evidence listed here. Represent this company and think something is wrong? A right-of-reply form is coming soon.