Canned & pouched fish: 4 companies
Ranked by grade, best first. How we rank How grades are decided
Ranked by grade, best first. How we rank
Good first, then On Track, then the two poor grades. Within a grade, stronger evidence, fewer problems and lower-risk countries come first, and stars move Good companies up. How grades are decided
127 brands rated so far in Fish & seafood. The main supermarket brands of canned, frozen and farmed fish and seafood, and the big global seafood companies behind them, many from South East Asia. Read the Fish & seafood guide for what goes wrong in the industry and what earns each grade. Missing one? Ask us to research it.
Grade
Any grade 4No best available in Canned & pouched fish
None of the 85 canned & pouched fish brands rated yet has no serious red flags plus a living wage or real progress towards one. How we pick
1Bumble BeeForced labour, last recorded in 2019 · Fish & seafoodCanned tuna and seafoodPublishes some details, but doesn't show its workers are paid and treated fairly.Lacks transparencyPartly verified2Chicken of the SeaForced and child labour, last recorded in 2015 · Fish & seafoodCanned and pouched tunaPublishes some details, but doesn't show its workers are paid and treated fairly.Lacks transparencyPartly verified3SealectForced labour, last recorded in 2012 · Fish & seafoodCanned tuna, sardines and mackerelPublishes some details, but doesn't show its workers are paid and treated fairly.Lacks transparencyPartly verified4StarKistForced labour, last recorded in 2026 · Fish & seafoodCanned and pouched tunaHas recent confirmed harm to workers that it hasn't put right.Harm on recordPartly verified
- Good and goes above and beyond (3 to 6 stars)
- Best available: the strongest in a category with no Good brand yet
- Est. = estimated, nothing found about the company itself
- * = self-reported
