Labour Lens

Harm on record. Has recent confirmed harm to workers that it hasn't put right.

Last researched 23 October 2026 · 10 sources

US canned and pouched tuna brand owned by Korea's Dongwon Industries.

In 2026, migrant fishers on Taiwanese tuna boats supplying the brand had their passports held and faced forced labour.

Also worth knowing

StarKist hasn't put this right.

Know something we've missed? Send evidence. Represent StarKist? Send a right of reply.

Compare StarKist with another brand

Why it's graded Harm on record

  • Not met: Meets 1 of 6 Good requirements.
  • Holds the grade back: It has 4 red flags: no evidence of a living wage, unaudited production in high-risk countries, forced or child labour and fish and seafood it can't trace to the boat or farm. Two or more red flags means a poor grade.
  • Holds the grade back: It's Harm on record because of a serious confirmed problem from the last 5 years that it hasn't put right: forced labour, last recorded in 2026.

How grades are decided


Good requirements 1 of 6

  • Not met: Pays a living wage, or holds a strong fair-pay certificationLiving wage: no evidence
  • Not met: Respects worker rightsMost of its products are made in countries such as Ecuador and Thailand, where unions are heavily restricted, and it has no full supply chain audit.
  • Not met: Supply chain independently audited or certified, or at least 80% made in countries with strong labour standards
  • Not met: No child or forced labour findings or links
  • Met: Names the factories or farms that make its products, or is fully certified by a scheme that holds and audits that listMakes its products in its own factories
  • Not met: Traces its catch to the boat or farm and has crews' or farm workers' conditions checked independently

Red flags 4

  • Red flag: No evidence it pays a living wage
  • Red flag: Made mostly in countries with poor worker rights, without a full independent audit of its supply chain
  • Red flag: Forced, slave or child labour found in or linked to its supply chain
  • Red flag: Relies on fish and seafood it can't trace to the boat or farmShown to explain the grade. It isn't one of the 3 red flags that set it.
  • Red flag: Fails its category's raw-material check (means Lacks transparency)

Stars it would earn as Good

None yet. Stars only show on Good companies. About stars

Where it's made

From StarKist's own disclosure: it makes its products in its own factories. Its list covers only part of its range. The rest is shown as where fish and seafood are usually processed.

Where it's made, and conditions there
CountryWorker rightsLegal minimum wageForced labour risk
EcuadorNo guarantee of rightsWell below a living wageModerate
ThailandUsual for the industryNo guarantee of rightsBelow a living wageModerate
ChinaUsual for the industryNo guarantee of rightsBelow a living wageModerate
VietnamUsual for the industrySystematic violationsWell below a living wageModerate
IndonesiaUsual for the industryNo guarantee of rightsWell below a living wageModerate
IndiaUsual for the industryNo guarantee of rightsWell below a living wageHigh
AustraliaUsual for the industryStrong protectionsAbout a living wageLow
NorwayUsual for the industryStrong protectionsAbout a living wageLow

Evidence

What we found

  • Risk across the industry, not a finding about this company: fishing fleets and processing plants have some of the worst documented forced labour, including trafficked crews held at sea for years.
  • Owns or runs its own production
  • Relies on fish and seafood from fishing boats and farms, where crews and farm workers, often migrants recruited into debt, have been held for months or years, beaten and denied pay, out of reach of factory audits. It hasn't shown any steps to trace its fish and seafood to the boat or farm or have the conditions of the people who catch or farm it checked, so it's graded Lacks transparency until it does.

Research notes StarKist cans tuna at its own plants in Pago Pago, American Samoa (a US territory not on the country list, so not shown) and Guayaquil, Ecuador. In 2020-21 it bought 98% of its tuna straight from vessels, all its purse-seine tuna from ISSF-listed vessels and about 7% from MSC-certified fisheries, but it publishes no vessel list. Parent Dongwon runs about 42 vessels. Its labour measures are a supplier code, signed anti-slavery certifications from major suppliers, Seafood Task Force membership and announced third-party audits of some suppliers, none shown to check crews. About half of the 313 vessels in its supply chain are Taiwan-owned or flagged, largely crewed by Indonesian migrants.

What independent sources say

SourceResultDetails
News reporting and NGO investigationsListedStarKist Chunk Light Tuna ranked last (20th of 20, failing) in Greenpeace USA's 2017 canned tuna ranking, which included fair treatment of fishers; no newer brand ranking covers it. View
Business & Human Rights Resource CentreListedStarKist did not respond to the Resource Centre's Pacific canned tuna human rights surveys in 2018 and 2021. View
News reporting and NGO investigationsProblem foundGlobal Labor Justice's 2026 report 'On the Hook' found forced labour on Taiwanese albacore vessels in StarKist's supply chain; a complaint against Dongwon went to Korea's OECD contact point. View
US Department of Labor goods listsListedThe US Department of Labor lists seafood from Taiwan, Indonesia, the Philippines, China and Thailand as produced with child or forced labour. View

Confirmed issues 1

Only confirmed problems are listed, and old ones drop off after 10 to 15 years. A problem the company has fully put right no longer counts against it, and nor does one it finds and is fixing itself. How problems are counted

Last recordedWhat happenedMade amends?
2026A 30-month Global Labor Justice investigation published in September 2026 found forced labour indicators for all 92 Indonesian fishers it interviewed from 37 Taiwanese albacore vessels supplying StarKist, and evidence meeting the forced labour definition for 62 of them, on 27 vessels; all had their passports held (Global Labor Justice, 2026). Source · search the archiveNoStarKist gave no public response to the report, and the fishers' union says two requests to StarKist went unanswered.

Sources and actions

Sources 10

Show all 10 sources
  1. StarKist company profile (Business & Human Rights Resource Centre) · search the archive · Non-response to Pacific canned tuna surveys in February 2018 and March 2021
  2. US Department of Labor fishing fact sheet · search the archive · Seafood from Taiwan, Indonesia, the Philippines, China and Thailand listed as produced with child or forced labour
  3. Migrant fishers call out StarKist in "Freedom for Fishers Campaign" (SeafoodSource, Sept 2026) · search the archive · GLJ report: forced labour indicators for all 92 fishers on 37 vessels, passports confiscated, debt; complaint to Korean OECD NCP; StarKist did not respond
  4. World Journal report on Global Labor Justice StarKist investigation (Sept 2026) · search the archive · 313 vessels in supply chain, 162 Taiwan-owned or flagged; 62 fishers on 27 vessels met ILO forced labour definition; union says two approaches went unanswered
  5. Denuncian abuso laboral de pescadores que abastecen a la empresa StarKist (Excelsior, Sept 2026) · search the archive · Mostly Indonesian migrant fishers on Taiwan-based albacore vessels supplying StarKist; 30 months of testimony
  6. StarKist forced to shut Ecuador factory even as American Samoa ops under strain (Samoa News, March 2020) · search the archive · StarKist's major factory in Guayaquil, Ecuador and its Pago Pago cannery
  7. Greenpeace says poor ranking of StarKist canned tuna not fault of Am Samoa's cannery workers (Samoa News, May 2017) · search the archive · StarKist ranked 20th of 20 in Greenpeace USA's April 2017 canned tuna ranking
  8. FishWise Visits StarKist in American Samoa (2016) · search the archive · StarKist contracts third-party audits of major suppliers for anti-slavery law compliance; Dongwon reefer carriers supply the cannery

Published by StarKist or its owner

  1. About StarKist Co. · search the archive · Facilities in Pago Pago, American Samoa and Guayaquil, Ecuador; wholly owned by Dongwon Industries, which operates 42 vessels
  2. Natural Resources & Policies (StarKist) · search the archive · 2020-21: 98% direct from vessels, 100% purse seine from PVR vessels, 6.94% MSC; supplier code, letters of certification, announced third-party supplier audits, STF member

Company details

Headquarters
United States
Last researched
23 October 2026
Cite this page
Labour Lens, "Is StarKist ethical? Labour rating", https://www.labourlens.net/brand/starkist, last researched 23 October 2026, accessed [date].
Method
Researched with AI assistance against published rules. How we check · What Harm on record means

Other canned and pouched fish brands

Nothing we've rated in canned and pouched fish is better than Lacks transparency yet.

See every canned and pouched fish brand

Something missing or wrong?

Grades are opinions based on the evidence listed here. Send us evidence, or a right of reply if you represent StarKist.