Labour Lens
Clothing & footwear · Fast fashion clothing, shoes, accessories

Zara (Inditex)

Partly verified

Zara (Inditex) raises serious concerns: workers in China, Morocco and Türkiye are very unlikely to earn a living wage, and unions and workers' rights are heavily restricted in China and Türkiye, with no independent audits.

Last researched 7 October 2026

Not doing enough. Workers in the supply chain are likely underpaid, unprotected or in danger, and in the worst cases face forced or child labour. Look for a better-graded alternative. What this grade means

Send evidenceRepresent Zara (Inditex)? Reply here

Good: 2 of 5

  • Pays a living wage
  • Respects worker rights
  • Full supply chain audit, or made only in countries with rigorous labour standards
  • No child or forced labour findings
  • Publishes where its products are made (supplier list, named farms or its own factories)

Great: 1 of 3

  • Pays beyond a living wage
  • Finds and fixes problems, or invests directly in workers' communities
  • Actively empowers workers

Needs all Good requirements plus two of these.

Red flags: 2

  • Does not pay a living wage
  • Hidden or unaudited supply chain (no certification or documentation, or major production in countries with poor worker rights without independent audits)

Where it's made

CountryWorker rightsLegal wagesForced labour risk
China 27%Systematic violationsBelow a living wageModerate
Morocco 16%Regular violationsWell below a living wageModerate
Türkiye 14%No guarantee of rightsBelow a living wageVery high
Bangladesh 11%No guarantee of rightsFar below a living wageHigh
Spain 10%Strong protectionsSlightly below a living wageLow
India 9%Systematic violationsWell below a living wageHigh
Portugal 8%Strong protectionsBelow a living wageLow
Pakistan 5%Systematic violationsFar below a living wageHigh

Country conditions from the ITUC Global Rights Index, Global Slavery Index and living wage benchmarks. Certifications and audits can raise a company above its countries' baseline.

Why this grade

  • Cotton is linked to forced labour (Xinjiang, Turkmenistan) and child labour in several growing regions.
  • Publishes supplier list
  • Signed the International Accord on garment factory safety
  • Modern slavery statement
  • Actively empowers workers (ownership, worker committees, union agreements, training)
  • Uses high-risk raw materials (e.g. leather tanning, mica, artisanal gold)
  • Uses higher-risk raw materials such as leather that aren't traced to the farm. This is noted as a risk but doesn't decide the grade.

Zara's owner Inditex publishes its supplier list and the number of suppliers and factories in each production cluster, but not production volumes by country; the shares shown are based on its 2023 supplier counts. It has a global framework agreement with the IndustriALL union federation, signed the International Accord including its Pakistan extension, and announced a phased exit from Myanmar in 2023 over human rights concerns. It gives no evidence that workers making its clothes earn a living wage and has no public, time-bound plan to get there.

What independent sources say

SourceResultDetails
Baptist World Aid Ethical Fashion ReportFoundScored 66 out of 100 in the 2024 Ethical Fashion Report, in the top 20% of companies assessed. View ↗
Fashion Transparency Index (Fashion Revolution)FoundScored 50% in the 2023 Fashion Transparency Index; the 2025 edition assessed climate disclosure only. View ↗
KnowTheChainFoundScored 38 out of 100 in the 2023 KnowTheChain apparel and footwear benchmark, against an average of 21. View ↗
Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (World Benchmarking Alliance)FoundScored 42.2 out of 100 in the 2023 Corporate Human Rights Benchmark. View ↗
Australian Modern Slavery RegisterFoundLodges Australian modern slavery statements through Group Zara Australia Pty Limited. View ↗
UK Modern Slavery Statement RegistryFoundITX UK Limited lodges modern slavery statements on the UK registry. View ↗
Fair WearNot listedNot a Fair Wear member. View ↗
Business & Human Rights Resource CentreFoundTracks 37 response requests to Inditex, which has responded to 95%, covering issues such as Moroccan factory abuses, Bangladesh closures and union busting in Türkiye. View ↗

Unconfirmed reports

Credible reports that haven't been confirmed by a regulator, completed investigation or the company. They're shown for your information and don't affect the grade.

  • A coalition of 28 civil society groups alleged that Zara Canada has supply links to Chinese firms accused of using Uyghur forced labour, and Canada's corporate ethics ombudsperson opened an investigation in 2023; Zara says it has no commercial relationship with any factory in Xinjiang (Just Style, 2023). Source ↗
  • The Australian Strategic Policy Institute's 2020 'Uyghurs for Sale' report named Zara among 83 brands linked to factories in China using Uyghur workers transferred from Xinjiang (Campaign for Uyghurs, 2020). Source ↗
  • A Public Eye investigation published in 2019 traced a Zara hoody to Turkish factories and reported low wages and worker exploitation driven by price pressure; Inditex called the report inaccurate (Business & Human Rights Resource Centre, 2019). Source ↗
  • A report on Moroccan garment factories supplying Zara and Mango described informal employment, unpaid overtime, excessive production targets and retaliation against union members, mostly affecting women workers (Business & Human Rights Resource Centre, 2025). Source ↗
  • The Turkish union Öz İplik İş accused Eroğlu Giyim, a supplier to Inditex, H&M and PVH, of threatening workers with dismissal to stop a strike in April 2026; Inditex did not comment (ESG Dive, 2026). Source ↗
Owned by
Inditex
Headquarters
Spain
Employees
About 162,000

Sources (12)

Last researched 7 October 2026 · details still being verified. Grades are opinions based on the evidence listed here. Represent this company and think something is wrong? A right-of-reply form is coming soon.