Labour Lens

Lacks transparency. Publishes some details, but doesn't show its workers are paid and treated fairly.

Last researched 23 October 2026 · 7 sources

UK frozen fish and seafood brand of Sofina Foods, based in Grimsby.

Until Young's traces its fish and seafood to the boat or farm and has the conditions of the people who catch or farm it checked independently, it can't show that they are free and fairly paid.

Also worth knowing

Young's supply chain was linked to forced labour in 2023, which it has only partly acted on.

Know something we've missed? Send evidence. Represent Young's? Send a right of reply.

Compare Young's with another brand

Why it's graded Lacks transparency

  • Not met: Meets 0 of 6 Good requirements.
  • Holds the grade back: It relies on fish and seafood that it can't trace to the boat or farm. That alone means a poor grade until it takes steps to trace it and check the conditions of the people who catch or farm it.
  • It isn't Harm on record: the most serious problem on its record (forced labour link, last recorded in 2023) was a link through a supplier, which the company has only partly acted on.
  • Lacks transparency is still a poor grade: in supply chains like this, workers who can't be seen to be treated fairly are usually underpaid or unprotected.

How grades are decided


Good requirements 0 of 6

  • Not met: Pays a living wage, or holds a strong fair-pay certificationLiving wage: no evidence
  • Not met: Respects worker rightsJudged on where its products are made: worker rights are poorly protected in Thailand, China and Vietnam.
  • Not met: Supply chain independently audited or certified, or at least 80% made in countries with strong labour standards
  • Not met: No child or forced labour findings or links
  • Not met: Names the factories or farms that make its products, or is fully certified by a scheme that holds and audits that list
  • Not met: Traces its catch to the boat or farm and has crews' or farm workers' conditions checked independently

Red flags 3

  • Red flag: No evidence it pays a living wage
  • Red flag: Forced, slave or child labour found in or linked to its supply chain
  • Red flag: Relies on fish and seafood it can't trace to the boat or farm
  • Red flag: Fails its category's raw-material check (means Lacks transparency)

Stars it would earn as Good

None yet. Stars only show on Good companies. About stars

Where it's made

Young's names some of the countries it makes in: the United Kingdom. The rest is shown as where fish and seafood are usually processed.

Where it's made, and conditions there
CountryWorker rightsLegal minimum wageForced labour risk
United KingdomRegular violationsClose to a living wageLow
ThailandUsual for the industryNo guarantee of rightsBelow a living wageModerate
ChinaUsual for the industryNo guarantee of rightsBelow a living wageModerate
VietnamUsual for the industrySystematic violationsWell below a living wageModerate
IndonesiaUsual for the industryNo guarantee of rightsWell below a living wageModerate
IndiaUsual for the industryNo guarantee of rightsWell below a living wageHigh
AustraliaUsual for the industryStrong protectionsAbout a living wageLow
EcuadorUsual for the industryNo guarantee of rightsWell below a living wageModerate
NorwayUsual for the industryStrong protectionsAbout a living wageLow

Evidence

What we found

  • Risk across the industry, not a finding about this company: fishing fleets and processing plants have some of the worst documented forced labour, including trafficked crews held at sea for years.
  • Makes part of its range in its own factories
  • Modern slavery statement
  • Relies on fish and seafood from fishing boats and farms, where crews and farm workers, often migrants recruited into debt, have been held for months or years, beaten and denied pay, out of reach of factory audits. It hasn't shown any steps to trace its fish and seafood to the boat or farm or have the conditions of the people who catch or farm it checked, so it's graded Lacks transparency until it does.

Research notes Young's makes its fish fingers, coated fish and smoked fish at its own factories in Grimsby and Fraserburgh, and also has a site in Kilkeel, Northern Ireland, but it buys some fish already processed abroad, including through importers sourcing from China, and does not name these suppliers. It publishes no supplier or vessel list and no certified share. Its modern slavery statement relies on Sedex and SMETA audits of processing sites, with no independent checks of fishing crews. In 2023 it said it was investigating links to Chinese plants accused of using Uyghur labour and to UK fleets accused of exploiting migrant fishers, but has published no findings.

What independent sources say

SourceResultDetails
UK Modern Slavery Statement RegistryListedYoung's Seafood's statement for April 2023 to March 2024 relies on Sedex and SMETA audits and names labour concerns in the Chinese seafood sector and Scottish langoustine fleets. View
Business & Human Rights Resource CentreListedYoung's responded in June 2023 to a Financial Times investigation into migrant fishers on UK 'transit visas', saying it held no stock from the fleets named and was reviewing future supply. View
News reporting and NGO investigationsListedNamed in the Outlaw Ocean Project's 2023 investigation as having sourced seafood from Chinese processors accused of using Uyghur forced labour. View

Confirmed issues 1

Only confirmed problems are listed, and old ones drop off after 10 to 15 years. A problem the company has fully put right no longer counts against it, and nor does one it finds and is fixing itself. How problems are counted

Last recordedWhat happenedMade amends?
2023Link through a supplierThe Outlaw Ocean Project reported in 2023 that Young's had sourced seafood, via UK importer Unibond, from Chinese processing firms accused of using Uyghur forced labour, including Qingdao Tianyuan, which used Uyghur workers from 2018 to 2023 (DeSmog, SeafoodSource, 2023). Source · archived copyPartlyYoung's said it began its own investigation in 2023; it has published no findings and did not answer NGOs' 2024 request for an update.

Sources and actions

Sources 7

Show all 7 sources
  1. Young's Seafood response (Business & Human Rights Resource Centre, June 2023) · search the archive · Response to FT investigation on migrant fishers; Young's has a processing facility in Kilkeel and held no stock from named fleets
  2. UK's Unibond purchased MSC pollock from Chinese plant accused of forced labor (Undercurrent News) · search the archive · Qingdao Tianyuan supplied pollock to Unibond's Chinese plant 2019-2022; Young's linked via Unibond and began an internal investigation
  3. Seafood industry cuts ties to Chinese firms accused of using Uyghur labor (SeafoodSource, Oct 2023) · search the archive · Young's Seafood named in the report as having sourced from Chinese processors that allegedly used Uyghur labour
  4. NGOs push companies for update on investigations into Uyghur and North Korean labor in seafood supply chain (SeafoodSource, July 2024) · search the archive · Young's among 13 companies asked by 18 NGOs for investigation updates; no public response
  5. Young's jobs at threat as site closure confirmed by Sofina (Food Manufacture, Aug 2023) · search the archive · Young's based mainly in Grimsby; whitefish processing moves to Humberstone Road, Grimsby and smoked processing to Fraserburgh
  6. The Outlaw Ocean Project exposes China's use of forced Uyghur labour to supply UK seafood industry (DeSmog, Nov 2023) · archived copy · Unibond supplied Young's; Qingdao Tianyuan used Uyghur forced labour since 2018, as recently as 2023; Young's launched an investigation

Published by Young's or its owner

  1. Modern Day Slavery Statement, Young's Seafood Ltd (2023-24) · search the archive · Sofina Foods subsidiary (operations in UK, Europe, Canada); hundreds of suppliers; SMETA and Sedex audits; concerns over Chinese seafood and Scottish langoustine fleets

Company details

Headquarters
United Kingdom
Last researched
23 October 2026
Cite this page
Labour Lens, "Is Young's ethical? Labour rating", https://www.labourlens.net/brand/youngs, last researched 23 October 2026, accessed [date].
Method
Researched with AI assistance against published rules. How we check · What Lacks transparency means

Other frozen fish and seafood brands

Nothing we've rated in frozen fish and seafood is better than Lacks transparency yet.

See every frozen fish and seafood brand

Something missing or wrong?

Grades are opinions based on the evidence listed here. Send us evidence, or a right of reply if you represent Young's.