Labour Lens

Lacks transparency. Publishes some details, but doesn't show its workers are paid and treated fairly.

Based on what Wahl publishes, with few independent checks. Researched with AI assistance against published rules. Last researched 3 November 2026 · 7 sources · How we check

Family-owned US maker of hair clippers and trimmers.

There's no proof Wahl pays more than the legal minimum, which in China is below a living wage, and it has no full independent audit.

Better-graded appliances

Graded higher than Wahl, selling the same kinds of things.

See every appliances brand

Know something we've missed? Send evidence. Represent Wahl? Send a right of reply.

Compare Wahl with another brand

Why it's graded Lacks transparency

Meets 3 of 6 Good requirements, with 2 red flags.Open why it has this gradeClose why it has this grade
  • Not met: Meets 3 of 6 Good requirements.
  • Holds the grade back: It doesn't show that workers are paid a living wage, and isn't certified as working towards one. On Track needs at least one of these.
  • It isn't Harm on record, because there's no serious confirmed problem on its record.
  • Lacks transparency is still a poor grade: in supply chains like this, workers who can't be seen to be treated fairly are usually underpaid or unprotected.

How grades are decided


Good requirements 3 of 6

  • Not met: Pays a living wage, or holds a strong fair-pay certificationLiving wage: no evidence
  • Not met: Respects worker rightsSome of its products are made in countries such as China and India, where unions are heavily restricted, and it has no full supply chain audit.
  • Not met: Supply chain independently audited or certified, or at least 80% made in countries with strong labour standards
  • Met: No child or forced labour findings or links
  • Met: Names the factories or farms that make its products, or is fully certified by a scheme that holds and audits that listMakes its products in its own factories
  • Met: High-risk raw materials (such as timber and cotton) traced or certified, or not a major part of its rangeNone recorded in a major share of its range

Red flags 2

  • Red flag: No evidence it pays a living wage
  • Red flag: Made partly in countries with poor worker rights, without a full independent audit of its supply chain

Stars it would earn as Good

None yet. Stars only show on Good companies. About stars

Where it's made

China, Vietnam, United States and 7 more countries.Open where it's madeClose where it's made

From Wahl's own disclosure: it makes its products in its own factories. Its list covers only part of its range. The rest is shown as where homewares and appliances are usually made.

Where it's made, and conditions there
CountryWorker rightsLegal minimum wageForced labour risk
ChinaNo guarantee of rightsBelow a living wageModerate
VietnamSystematic violationsWell below a living wageModerate
United StatesSystematic violationsBelow a living wageLow
HungarySystematic violationsClose to a living wageModerate
United KingdomRegular violationsClose to a living wageLow
GermanyStrong protectionsAbout a living wageLow
IndiaUsual for the industryNo guarantee of rightsWell below a living wageHigh
PolandUsual for the industryRegular violationsClose to a living wageModerate
IndonesiaUsual for the industryNo guarantee of rightsWell below a living wageModerate
MalaysiaUsual for the industryNo guarantee of rightsBelow a living wageModerate

Evidence

2 things we found and what 2 independent sources say.Open the evidenceClose the evidence

What we found

  • No high-risk raw materials (such as timber and cotton) are recorded in a major share of its range, so the raw-material check doesn't hold it back for Good.
  • Owns or runs its own production

Research notes Wahl makes its clippers in its own factories in the US (Sterling, Illinois, where it cut about a fifth of staff in 2025), Hungary, China, the UK, Germany and Vietnam, but gives no split between them. Its California supply chain disclosure says direct suppliers must certify compliance and may face unannounced third-party visits, and its workplace standards require legal minimum wages. It publishes no audit results, supplier list or living wage commitment, and no labour abuses tied to Wahl products have been reported.

What independent sources say

SourceResultDetails
Baptist World Aid Ethical Fashion ReportAnother organisation's ratingNot assessedNot assessed in Baptist World Aid's Ethical Fashion or Electronics reports, which do not cover personal care appliance makers. View
Australian Modern Slavery RegisterCouldn't confirmNo modern slavery statement for Wahl's Australian subsidiary appears on the Australian register; it may fall below the reporting threshold. View

Sources and actions

7 sources, company details, and how to send evidence or a right of reply.Open the sources and company detailsClose the sources and company details

Sources 7

Show all 7 sources
  1. Wahl - Manufacturing Engineering Internship companies (Sauk Valley Community College) · search the archive · Wahl has factories in Hungary, China, UK, Germany and Vietnam, HQ in Sterling IL; over 3,500 staff
  2. Commencement of Wahl Vietnam factory (Unicons, 2013) · search the archive · Wahl Clipper Corporation's own first factory in Vietnam, making hair clippers and trimmers
  3. Wahl Clipper to cut Sterling workforce by 20% (Shaw Local, 2025) · search the archive · Wahl still makes trimmers in Sterling, Illinois; about 20% of Sterling staff cut in 2025
  4. Wahl (JB Hi-Fi) · search the archive · Wahl clippers and trimmers sold by JB Hi-Fi in Australia

Published by Wahl or its owner

  1. Wahl Clipper Corporation California Supply Chains Act disclosure (2024) · search the archive · Direct suppliers certify compliance; internal or third-party verification and possible unannounced visits (rev. 03, 2024)
  2. Wahl Clipper Corporation Workplace Standards (2017) · search the archive · Wages must meet the legal minimum; no living wage benchmark
  3. Wahl Canada: About us · search the archive · Wahl plant on North Locust Street in Sterling since 1957; shaver mass production at Sterling plant from 1991; Wahl acquired Moser in 1996

Company details

Headquarters
United States
Employees
About 3,500
Last researched
3 November 2026
Cite this page
Labour Lens, "Is Wahl ethical? Labour rating", https://www.labourlens.net/brand/wahl, last researched 3 November 2026, accessed [date].
Method
Researched with AI assistance against published rules. How we check · What Lacks transparency means

Something missing or wrong?

Grades are opinions based on the evidence listed here. Send us evidence, or a right of reply if you represent Wahl.

Choose a better-graded brand

26 brands in appliances are graded higher than Wahl.

See 26 better-graded brands in appliancesSearch another brand