Labour Lens

Vivobarefoot

Lacks transparency

Lacks transparency. Publishes some details, but doesn't show its workers are paid and treated fairly.

Last researched 3 November 2026 · 6 sources

British maker of thin-soled barefoot shoes.

There's no proof Vivobarefoot pays more than the legal minimum, which in Vietnam is well below a living wage.

Know something we've missed? Send evidence. Represent Vivobarefoot? Send a right of reply.

Compare Vivobarefoot with another brand

Why it's graded Lacks transparency

  • Not met: Meets 3 of 6 Good requirements.
  • Holds the grade back: It doesn't show that workers are paid a living wage, and isn't certified as working towards one. On Track needs at least one of these.
  • It isn't Harm on record, because there's no serious confirmed problem on its record.
  • Lacks transparency is still a poor grade: in supply chains like this, workers who can't be seen to be treated fairly are usually underpaid or unprotected.

How grades are decided


Good requirements 3 of 6

  • Not met: Pays a living wage, or holds a strong fair-pay certificationLiving wage: no evidence
  • Met: Respects worker rights
  • Not met: Supply chain independently audited or certified, or at least 80% made in countries with strong labour standards
  • Met: No child or forced labour findings or links
  • Met: Names the factories or farms that make its products, or is fully certified by a scheme that holds and audits that listPublishes its supplier list
  • Not met: High-risk raw materials (cotton and leather) traced or certified, or not a major part of its rangeNot traced or certified: leather

Red flags 1

  • Red flag: No evidence it pays a living wage

Stars it would earn as Good

None yet. Stars only show on Good companies. About stars

Where it's made

From Vivobarefoot's own disclosure: it publishes its supplier list.

Where it's made, and conditions there
CountryWorker rightsLegal minimum wageForced labour risk
VietnamSystematic violationsWell below a living wageModerate
PortugalStrong protectionsClose to a living wageLow
NamibiaRegular violationsNot ratedLow
MongoliaWe don't have labour ratings for this country yet.

Evidence

What we found

  • Modern slavery statement
  • Publishes supplier list
  • Doesn't show where its leather comes from. Leather is linked to hazardous tannery work and forced labour on some cattle ranches, so it can't be graded Good until it traces or certifies it.
  • Uses cotton in only a few products and doesn't show where it comes from. That doesn't count against it for Good, but the "Open supply chain" star needs all of it traced, certified or upcycled.

Research notes Vivobarefoot is a UK B Corp (certified 2020, recertified 2024) whose shoes are finished at 11 factories in Vietnam, Portugal, Mongolia and Namibia, with components from 57 tier 2 sites mainly in Vietnam, China and Thailand and leather from Thailand and Spain; it does not publish the share made in each country. Its 2024/25 modern slavery statement reports its own supplier assessments (32 labour findings in the last 10 full assessments) but gives no wage detail and makes no living wage commitment. It publishes an interactive map of tier 1 and tier 2 partners, runs the ReVivo repair and resale scheme, and sells through vivobarefoot.com.au.

What independent sources say

SourceResultDetails
B Corp directoryCertifiedCertified B Corporation since 2020 and recertified in 2024. View
Fair WearNot listedNo Fair Wear membership is claimed by the brand. View
Business & Human Rights Resource CentreNot listedNo supply chain labour allegations against Vivobarefoot appear in news or NGO reporting. View

Sources and actions

Sources 6

Show all 6 sources
  1. B Lab directory: Vivobarefoot · search the archive · Certified B Corporation since 2020, operating in the United Kingdom.
  2. Good On You: Vivobarefoot · search the archive · People rating 3/5 'It's a start'; final stage in extreme-risk countries; partial traceability; unclear whether living wages are paid.
  3. FashionUnited: Vivobarefoot 2025 report · search the archive · FY2025 revenue GBP 91.4m; 1.2 million pairs sold; Tier 1 and Tier 2 transparency maintained; 63,000 pairs repaired or refurbished.

Published by Vivobarefoot or its owner

  1. Vivobarefoot Modern Slavery and Human Trafficking Statement FY2024/25 · search the archive · FY2024/25: 11 tier 1 sites in Vietnam, Portugal, Mongolia, Namibia (~11,900 workers); 57 tier 2 sites; leather from Thailand, Spain; no living wage.
  2. Vivobarefoot: B Corp · search the archive · Certified B Corp, recertified 2024; links to annual report and modern slavery statement; supplier compliance system piloted in Vietnam in 2025.
  3. Vivobarefoot AU store · search the archive · Australian online store with AUD pricing, Australian phone number and shipping within Australia.

Company details

Headquarters
United Kingdom
Employees
About 100
Last researched
3 November 2026
Cite this page
Labour Lens, "Is Vivobarefoot ethical? Labour rating", https://www.labourlens.net/brand/vivobarefoot, last researched 3 November 2026, accessed [date].
Method
Researched with AI assistance against published rules. How we check · What Lacks transparency means

Better-graded footwear

Something missing or wrong?

Grades are opinions based on the evidence listed here. Send us evidence, or a right of reply if you represent Vivobarefoot.