Labour Lens

Lacks transparency. Publishes some details, but doesn't show its workers are paid and treated fairly.

Last researched 3 November 2026 · 7 sources

Tata-owned British tea brand.

Unsafe working conditions were documented in Tetley's supply chain in 2015, which it has only partly put right.

Why it's graded Lacks transparency

  • Not met: Meets 2 of 5 Good requirements.
  • Holds the grade back: It has 3 red flags: no evidence of a living wage, clear breaches of labour conditions and unaudited production in high-risk countries. Two or more red flags means a poor grade.
  • It isn't Harm on record: the most serious problem on its record (unsafe conditions, last recorded in 2015) is more than 5 years old.
  • Lacks transparency is still a poor grade: in supply chains like this, workers who can't be seen to be treated fairly are usually underpaid or unprotected.

How grades are decided


Good requirements 2 of 5

  • Not met: Pays a living wage, or holds a strong fair-pay certificationLiving wage: no evidence
  • Not met: Respects worker rightsA confirmed problem counts against it: unsafe conditions, last recorded in 2015
  • Not met: Supply chain independently audited or certified, or at least 80% made in countries with strong labour standards
  • Met: No confirmed child or forced labour findings or linksAn unconfirmed report of child labour is listed below. It doesn't affect the grade.
  • Met: Names the factories or farms that make its products, or is fully certified by a scheme that holds and audits that listNames its suppliers

Red flags 3

  • Red flag: No evidence it pays a living wage
  • Red flag: Clear breaches of labour conditions
  • Red flag: Made partly in countries with poor worker rights, without a full independent audit of its supply chain
Stars it would earn as Good:
StarAwarded for
Finds and fixes problems, or invests in communities

Stars only show on Good companies. About stars

Where its tea is grown

From Tetley's own disclosure: it names its suppliers.

Where its tea is grown, share by country, and conditions there
CountryShareWorker rightsLegal minimum wageForced labour risk
Kenya42%Systematic violationsWell below a living wageModerate
IndiaNot givenNo guarantee of rightsWell below a living wageHigh
Sri LankaNot givenSystematic violationsWell below a living wageModerate
ChinaNot givenNo guarantee of rightsBelow a living wageModerate
Malawi12%Strong protectionsFar below a living wageModerate

Evidence

What we found

  • Risk across the industry, not a finding about this company: tea estate wages in Assam, Sri Lanka and Kenya are among the lowest of any export crop, often paid partly in kind (housing, rations). (partly offset by certification or direct sourcing) Source
  • Publishes supplier list
  • Modern slavery statement
  • Invests in worker and farming communities

Research notes Tetley's UK business buys about 32 million kg of tea a year from over 350 suppliers; Kenya supplies about 42% and Malawi 12%, with the rest from countries including India, Sri Lanka and China. All Tetley tea is Rainforest Alliance certified, a standard that is weak on wages. It publishes a list of producers it has bought from and is a founding member of the Ethical Tea Partnership. It funds solar lamps and savings groups on Malawian estates but has no published living wage commitment or wage data.

What independent sources say

SourceResultDetails
Fairtrade (incl. FLOCERT and Fairtrade ANZ)UnclearTetley relies on Rainforest Alliance rather than Fairtrade for its tea. View
UK Modern Slavery Statement RegistryListedTata Consumer Products GB publishes a UK slavery and human trafficking statement for the year to March 2025, covering Tetley and teapigs. View
Australian Modern Slavery RegisterNot listedNo Australian modern slavery statement for Tetley was identified. View
Business & Human Rights Resource CentreListedTracks the 2015 BBC Assam investigation, 2021 Malawi sexual abuse claims and the 2025 ABC Sri Lanka investigation, all naming Tetley. View

Confirmed issues 1

Only confirmed problems are listed, and old ones drop off after 10 to 15 years. A problem the company has fully put right no longer counts against it, and nor does one it finds and is fixing itself. How problems are counted

Last recordedWhat happenedMade amends?
2015A 2015 BBC investigation found broken housing, poor sanitation and workers handling agrochemicals without protective equipment on McLeod Russel estates in Assam, India, that supplied Tetley; McLeod Russel admitted the conditions were not acceptable. Source · search the archivePartlyTetley, PG Tips and Twinings committed to work with the estates, and Tata cited its Ethical Tea Partnership monitoring. No compensation for workers was reported.

Unconfirmed reports

Credible reports that haven't been confirmed by a regulator, completed investigation or the company. They're shown for your information and don't affect the grade.

  • In 2021, 36 Malawian women settled UK High Court claims of rape and sexual harassment on Eastern Produce Malawi tea estates, a named Tetley supplier; the owner, Camellia, paid compensation and set up an independently monitored grievance mechanism without admitting liability. Source
  • In 2021 women workers sued Lujeri Tea Estates in Malawi, listed as a Tetley supplier, alleging systemic sexual harassment, coercion and rape; Tetley temporarily suspended supplies pending an investigation. Source
  • A 2025 ABC Foreign Correspondent investigation found low wages, poor housing and child labour on certified Sri Lankan tea estates; Tetley said one tea it sells in Australia contains Sri Lankan tea and that it was reviewing its traceability. Source

Sources and actions

Sources 7

Show all 7 sources
  1. BHRRC: BBC investigates inhumane working conditions in tea plantations in Assam · search the archive · 2015 BBC investigation linked McLeod Russel Assam estates to Tetley; joint brand statement on improving estates; Tata response.
  2. BHRRC: Malawi women claim systemic sex abuse on tea plantations owned by British brand suppliers · search the archive · 2021 claim against Lujeri Tea Estates, listed as a supplier by Tetley; Tetley temporarily suspended supplies.
  3. BHRRC: Sri Lanka low wages and child labour on Rainforest Alliance certified tea estates (ABC, 2025) · search the archive · March 2025 ABC investigation of certified Sri Lankan estates; Tetley and Tata response on Sri Lankan volume and traceability.
  4. Leigh Day: settlement of claims against the Camellia group (Malawi) · search the archive · February 2021 settlement with 36 women employed by Eastern Produce Malawi; compensation and monitored grievance mechanism; no admission.

Published by Tetley or its owner

  1. Tata Consumer Products GB slavery and human trafficking statement FY2024-25 · search the archive · 32m kg of tea from 350+ suppliers; Kenya about 42%, Malawi 12%, rest incl. India; Tetley teas 100% Rainforest Alliance; no living wage commitment.
  2. Tetley sustainability report 2022 · search the archive · Sources from 20+ countries incl. Kenya, Sri Lanka, India and China; largest buyer in Malawi; names Eastern Produce Malawi and Satemwa as suppliers.
  3. Tetley: Our suppliers · search the archive · Publishes a list of all producers it has sourced tea from; 100% of UK tea from certified producers.

Company details

Headquarters
United Kingdom
Last researched
3 November 2026
Cite this page
Labour Lens, "Is Tetley ethical? Labour rating", https://www.labourlens.net/brand/tetley, last researched 3 November 2026, accessed [date].
Method
Researched with AI assistance against published rules. How we check · What Lacks transparency means

Something missing or wrong?

Grades are opinions based on the evidence listed here. Send us evidence, or a right of reply if you represent Tetley.