Labour Lens

Lacks transparency. Publishes some details, but doesn't show its workers are paid and treated fairly.

Last researched 2 November 2026 · 6 sources

London fashion label selling menswear and womenswear.

There's no proof Ted Baker pays more than the legal minimum, which in China is below a living wage.

Know something we've missed? Send evidence. Represent Ted Baker? Send a right of reply.

Compare Ted Baker with another brand

Why it's graded Lacks transparency

  • Not met: Meets 2 of 6 Good requirements.
  • Holds the grade back: It doesn't show that workers are paid a living wage, and isn't certified as working towards one. On Track needs at least one of these.
  • It isn't Harm on record, because there's no serious confirmed problem on its record.
  • Lacks transparency is still a poor grade: in supply chains like this, workers who can't be seen to be treated fairly are usually underpaid or unprotected.

How grades are decided


Good requirements 2 of 6

  • Not met: Pays a living wage, or holds a strong fair-pay certificationLiving wage: no evidence
  • Not met: Respects worker rightsJudged on where its products are made: worker rights are poorly protected in China, Vietnam and India.
  • Met: Supply chain independently audited or certified, or at least 80% made in countries with strong labour standards
  • Met: No child or forced labour findings or links
  • Not met: Names the factories or farms that make its products, or is fully certified by a scheme that holds and audits that list
  • Not met: High-risk raw materials (cotton and leather) traced or certified, or not a major part of its rangeNot traced or certified: cotton

Red flags 1

  • Red flag: No evidence it pays a living wage

Stars it would earn as Good

None yet. Stars only show on Good companies. About stars

Where it's made

Ted Baker names some of the countries it makes in: China, Türkiye, India, Portugal and Vietnam. The rest is shown as where clothes and shoes are usually made.

Where it's made, and conditions there
CountryWorker rightsLegal minimum wageForced labour risk
ChinaNo guarantee of rightsBelow a living wageModerate
VietnamSystematic violationsWell below a living wageModerate
IndiaNo guarantee of rightsWell below a living wageHigh
TürkiyeNo guarantee of rightsBelow a living wageVery high
PortugalStrong protectionsClose to a living wageLow
BangladeshUsual for the industryNo guarantee of rightsFar below a living wageModerate
CambodiaUsual for the industryNo guarantee of rightsFar below a living wageModerate
IndonesiaUsual for the industryNo guarantee of rightsWell below a living wageModerate
PakistanUsual for the industryNo guarantee of rightsFar below a living wageHigh

Evidence

What we found

  • Independent social audits of all its main factories
  • Signed the International Accord on garment factory safety Source
  • Modern slavery statement
  • Doesn't show where its cotton comes from. Cotton is linked to forced labour in Xinjiang and Turkmenistan, and child labour in several growing regions, so it can't be graded Good until it traces or certifies it.
  • Uses leather in only a few products and doesn't show where it comes from. That doesn't count against it for Good, but the "Open supply chain" star needs all of it traced, certified or upcycled.

Research notes Ted Baker's latest modern slavery statement (2022-23) reported 137 independent factories in 19 countries, led by China, Turkey, India, Portugal and Vietnam, all audited and Sedex members, with excessive overtime in China and subcontracting in Turkey named as risks. Since its UK operator collapsed in 2024, products are designed and made by PDS Group's New Lobster under licence, and no newer statement or factory list has been published. It signed the Bangladesh Accord in 2021 but has no living wage commitment.

What independent sources say

SourceResultDetails
Fashion Transparency Index (Fashion Revolution)ListedScored 26% in the 2023 Fashion Transparency Index. View
Baptist World Aid Ethical Fashion ReportNot listedTed Baker was not assessed in the 2026 Ethical Fashion Report. View
UK Modern Slavery Statement RegistryListedLast modern slavery statement covers 2022-23: 137 Tier 1 factories in 19 countries, all audited; no newer statement found after the 2024 administration of its UK operator. View
Business & Human Rights Resource CentreListedCompany profile lists no allegations and no response requests. View

Sources and actions

Sources 6

Show all 6 sources
  1. List of Accord brand signatories, 21 April 2023 · search the archive · Ted Baker listed as an International Accord signatory (not the Pakistan Accord)
  2. Ted Baker plc - Shop Ethical · search the archive · Fashion Transparency Index 2023 score 26/100
  3. Ted Baker - Business & Human Rights Resource Centre · search the archive · No allegations or response requests recorded
  4. Former Barbour MD to lead Ted Baker wholesale business in 5-year deal (Retail Gazette) · search the archive · PDS Group's New Lobster handles Ted Baker design, development and production globally after 2024 administration
  5. Authentic Brands Group signs agreements for Ted Baker in Europe (MR Magazine) · search the archive · 2023: PDS Group named core licensee for clothing, shirts, dresses and handbags

Published by Ted Baker or its owner

  1. Ted Baker Modern Slavery Statement FY2023 · search the archive · 137 Tier 1 factories in 19 countries; top: China, Turkey, India, Portugal, Vietnam; 100% audited; Accord 2021; cotton mill mapping; tannery forms

Company details

Headquarters
United Kingdom
Last researched
2 November 2026
Cite this page
Labour Lens, "Is Ted Baker ethical? Labour rating", https://www.labourlens.net/brand/ted-baker, last researched 2 November 2026, accessed [date].
Method
Researched with AI assistance against published rules. How we check · What Lacks transparency means

Better-graded suits and tailoring

Something missing or wrong?

Grades are opinions based on the evidence listed here. Send us evidence, or a right of reply if you represent Ted Baker.