Labour Lens
Clothing & footwear · Rugged menswear, workwear and outerwear

Taylor Stitch

Partly verified

Taylor Stitch raises serious concerns: workers in the countries clothing & footwear usually comes from, such as China and Bangladesh are very unlikely to earn a living wage, and unions and workers' rights are heavily restricted in the countries clothing & footwear usually comes from, such as China and Bangladesh, with no independent audits.

Last researched 7 October 2026

Not doing enough. Workers in the supply chain are likely underpaid, unprotected or in danger, and in the worst cases face forced or child labour. Look for a better-graded alternative. What this grade means

Send evidenceRepresent Taylor Stitch? Reply here

Good: 1 of 5

  • Pays a living wage
  • Respects worker rights
  • Full supply chain audit, or made only in countries with rigorous labour standards
  • No child or forced labour findings
  • Publishes where its products are made (supplier list, named farms or its own factories)

Great: 0 of 3

  • Pays beyond a living wage
  • Finds and fixes problems, or invests directly in workers' communities
  • Actively empowers workers

Needs all Good requirements plus two of these.

Red flags: 2

  • Does not pay a living wage
  • Hidden or unaudited supply chain (no certification or documentation, or major production in countries with poor worker rights without independent audits)

Where it's made: not disclosed

Showing where clothing & footwear products are usually made instead.

CountryWorker rightsLegal wagesForced labour risk
China 30%Systematic violationsBelow a living wageModerate
Bangladesh 20%No guarantee of rightsFar below a living wageHigh
Vietnam 15%Systematic violationsWell below a living wageModerate
India 10%Systematic violationsWell below a living wageHigh
Cambodia 8%Systematic violationsFar below a living wageModerate
Türkiye 7%No guarantee of rightsBelow a living wageVery high
Indonesia 5%Systematic violationsWell below a living wageModerate
Pakistan 5%Systematic violationsFar below a living wageHigh

Country conditions from the ITUC Global Rights Index, Global Slavery Index and living wage benchmarks. Certifications and audits can raise a company above its countries' baseline.

Why this grade

  • Cotton is linked to forced labour (Xinjiang, Turkmenistan) and child labour in several growing regions.
  • Uses high-risk raw materials (e.g. leather tanning, mica, artisanal gold)
  • Uses higher-risk raw materials such as leather that aren't traced to the farm. This is noted as a risk but doesn't decide the grade.

Taylor Stitch names only a few factory partners, such as Golden Bear Sportswear in the US, and does not publish a full supplier list or the share of production made in each country. Product labels and import records show items made in China, Portugal and Vietnam, and the company says it seeks fair pay and benefits at partner factories, but it gives no audit results, code of conduct or evidence that workers across its supply chain earn a living wage. Some products use GOTS organic cotton, and leather comes from tanneries with Leather Working Group Gold ratings, which cover environmental performance rather than labour.

What independent sources say

SourceResultDetails
Fair WearNot listedNot a Fair Wear member brand. View ↗
B Corp directoryNot listedNo Taylor Stitch listing in the B Corp directory. View ↗
Baptist World Aid Ethical Fashion ReportNot listedNot among the companies assessed in the Ethical Fashion Report. View ↗
Fashion Transparency Index (Fashion Revolution)Not listedNot included in the Fashion Transparency Index datasets. View ↗
Business & Human Rights Resource CentreNot listedNo company page or recorded allegations. View ↗
Open Supply HubUnclearNo published factory list linked to the brand was identified. View ↗
Headquarters
United States

Sources (10)

Last researched 7 October 2026 · details still being verified. Grades are opinions based on the evidence listed here. Represent this company and think something is wrong? A right-of-reply form is coming soon.