Labour Lens

Lacks transparency. Publishes some details, but doesn't show its workers are paid and treated fairly.

Last researched 3 November 2026 · 7 sources

Kobe jeweller known for pearl jewellery.

TASAKI can't show that the workers who make its products in Myanmar earn a living wage, which workers there are very unlikely to.

Also worth knowing

It has no full independent audit.

Why it's graded Lacks transparency

  • Not met: Meets 2 of 6 Good requirements.
  • Holds the grade back: It has 3 red flags: no evidence of a living wage, unaudited production in high-risk countries and untraced high-risk mined materials. Two or more red flags means a poor grade.
  • It isn't Harm on record, because there's no serious confirmed problem on its record.
  • Lacks transparency is still a poor grade: in supply chains like this, workers who can't be seen to be treated fairly are usually underpaid or unprotected.

How grades are decided


Good requirements 2 of 6

  • Not met: Pays a living wage, or holds a strong fair-pay certificationLiving wage: no evidence
  • Not met: Respects worker rightsMost of its products are made in countries such as India and China, where unions are heavily restricted, and it has no full supply chain audit.
  • Not met: Supply chain independently audited or certified, or at least 80% made in countries with strong labour standards
  • Met: No child or forced labour findings or links
  • Met: Names the factories or farms that make its products, or is fully certified by a scheme that holds and audits that listMakes its products in its own factories
  • Not met: Conflict-free: diamonds, gems and gold traced to the mine, lab-grown, recycled or Fairmined (the Kimberley Process alone isn't enough)

Red flags 3

  • Red flag: No evidence it pays a living wage
  • Red flag: Made mostly in countries with poor worker rights, without a full independent audit of its supply chain
  • Red flag: Relies on high-risk mined materials it can't traceShown to explain the grade. It isn't one of the 2 red flags that set it.
  • Red flag: Fails its category's raw-material check (means Lacks transparency)

Stars it would earn as Good

None yet. Stars only show on Good companies. About stars

Where it's made

From TASAKI's own disclosure: it makes its products in its own factories. Its list covers only part of its range. The rest is shown as where jewellery and watches are usually made.

Where it's made, and conditions there
CountryWorker rightsLegal minimum wageForced labour risk
IndiaUsual for the industryNo guarantee of rightsWell below a living wageHigh
ChinaUsual for the industryNo guarantee of rightsBelow a living wageModerate
JapanStrong protectionsClose to a living wageLow
MyanmarNo guarantee of rightsFar below a living wageVery high
ThailandUsual for the industryNo guarantee of rightsBelow a living wageModerate
ItalyUsual for the industryStrong protectionsClose to a living wageLow
SwitzerlandUsual for the industryRegular violationsAbout a living wageLow

Evidence

What we found

  • Risk across the industry, not a finding about this company: gold and gemstone mining are linked to child labour, forced labour and mercury poisoning.
  • Owns or runs its own production
  • Relies on gold and gemstones from artisanal mines where workers face mercury poisoning, silica dust and deadly collapses. It hasn't shown any steps to trace these materials to the mine, so it's graded Lacks transparency until it does.

Research notes TASAKI farms pearls at its own farms in Kujukushima, Ise-Shima and Uwajima, Japan, and makes jewellery in its own factory at its Kobe headquarters. Its subsidiary Myanmar Tasaki also runs pearl farms on Domae and Langan islands in Myanmar; shares between the two are not disclosed. TASAKI claims conflict-free sourcing of pearls, diamonds and metals but publishes no human rights policy, supplier list, audit results or living wage commitment, and is not an RJC member.

What independent sources say

SourceResultDetails
News reporting and NGO investigationsListedJustice For Myanmar (2024) reported Myanmar Tasaki's production-sharing contract with sanctioned Myanmar Pearl Enterprise since 1997; Burma Campaign UK added it to its 'dirty list' in 2022. View
Australian Modern Slavery RegisterNot coveredNo Australian TASAKI entity large enough to report under the Modern Slavery Act was identified. View

Unconfirmed reports

Credible reports that haven't been confirmed by a regulator, completed investigation or the company. They're shown for your information and don't affect the grade.

  • Justice For Myanmar and Mekong Watch reported in 2024 that subsidiary Myanmar Tasaki farms pearls under a production-sharing deal with sanctioned state-owned Myanmar Pearl Enterprise, now under junta control; Tasaki did not respond. Source
  • Dawei Watch reported in 2024 that Myanmar Tasaki's pearl farms in the Myeik Archipelago expanded onto land and waters used by Moken Indigenous communities; Tasaki denies any commercial ties with the military. Source

Sources and actions

Sources 7

Show all 7 sources
  1. Bloomberg - FountainVest, Unison acquire jeweler Tasaki for $660 million (2024) · search the archive · FountainVest Partners and Unison Capital acquired TASAKI in November 2024.
  2. Openers - Japanese Craftsmanship: TASAKI Jewelry (2015) · search the archive · Kobe headquarters houses TASAKI's own jewellery factory.
  3. Dawei Watch - Myanmar Tasaki pearl farms (2024) · search the archive · Myanmar Tasaki runs pearl farms on Domae and Langan islands; Tasaki denies military ties; Moken displacement concerns.
  4. Justice For Myanmar - Tasaki and investors risk complicity (2024) · search the archive · Myanmar Tasaki partnered with Myanmar Pearl Enterprise since 1997; Tasaki did not respond by July 2024.

Published by TASAKI or its owner

  1. TASAKI - Pearl Farm Story · search the archive · Own pearl farms in Kujukushima (Nagasaki), Ise-Shima (Mie) and Uwajima (Ehime), Japan.
  2. TASAKI - Corporate Profile · search the archive · Head office in Kobe; 651 employees; subsidiary of TASAKI Holdings.
  3. TASAKI - Store locator · search the archive · Store locator lists a TASAKI store in Melbourne, Australia.

Company details

Headquarters
Japan
Employees
About 651
Last researched
3 November 2026
Cite this page
Labour Lens, "Is TASAKI ethical? Labour rating", https://www.labourlens.net/brand/tasaki, last researched 3 November 2026, accessed [date].
Method
Researched with AI assistance against published rules. How we check · What Lacks transparency means

Something missing or wrong?

Grades are opinions based on the evidence listed here. Send us evidence, or a right of reply if you represent TASAKI.