S'well
Lacks transparency. Publishes some details, but doesn't show its workers are paid and treated fairly.
Last researched 3 November 2026 · 5 sources
New York brand of insulated bottles and tumblers.
There's no proof S'well pays more than the legal minimum, which in China is below a living wage, and it has no full independent audit.
Know something we've missed? Send evidence. Represent S'well? Send a right of reply.
Compare S'well with another brand
Why it's graded Lacks transparency
- Not met: Meets 2 of 6 Good requirements.
- Holds the grade back: It doesn't show that workers are paid a living wage, and isn't certified as working towards one. On Track needs at least one of these.
- It isn't Harm on record, because there's no serious confirmed problem on its record.
- Lacks transparency is still a poor grade: in supply chains like this, workers who can't be seen to be treated fairly are usually underpaid or unprotected.
Good requirements 2 of 6
- Not met: Pays a living wage, or holds a strong fair-pay certificationLiving wage: no evidence
- Not met: Respects worker rightsMost of its products are made in China, where unions are heavily restricted, and it has no full supply chain audit.
- Not met: Supply chain independently audited or certified, or at least 80% made in countries with strong labour standards
- Met: No child or forced labour findings or links
- Not met: Names the factories or farms that make its products, or is fully certified by a scheme that holds and audits that list
- Met: High-risk raw materials (such as timber and cotton) traced or certified, or not a major part of its rangeNone recorded in a major share of its range
Red flags 2
- Red flag: No evidence it pays a living wage
- Red flag: Hidden supply chain, mostly in countries with poor worker rights
Stars it would earn as Good
None yet. Stars only show on Good companies. About stars
Where it's made
S'well says which countries it makes its products in, but doesn't name the factories.
| Country | Worker rights | Legal minimum wage | Forced labour risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| China | No guarantee of rights | Below a living wage | Moderate |
Evidence
What we found
- No high-risk raw materials (such as timber and cotton) are recorded in a major share of its range, so the raw-material check doesn't hold it back for Good.
Research notes S'well says its bottles are designed in New York and made in China, but it names no factories and publishes no supplier list or audit results. Owner Lifetime Brands sources almost all its products from outside suppliers, primarily in China, and says third-party makers may not meet its workforce standards, but it describes no audit programme or living wage commitment.
What independent sources say
| Source | Result | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Baptist World Aid Ethical Fashion Report | Not covered | Baptist World Aid's Ethical Fashion and Electronics reports do not cover drinkware brands. View |
| Australian Modern Slavery Register | Not listed | No Australian modern slavery statement found for S'well or Lifetime Brands. View |
| Business & Human Rights Resource Centre | Not listed | No labour abuse reports involving S'well suppliers were found on the Business & Human Rights Resource Centre. View |
Sources and actions
Sources 5
Show all 5 sources
- Lifetime Brands Form 10-K FY2025 · search the archive · Almost all products sourced abroad, primarily China; S'well listed as an owned brand at end of 2025; no audit programme described
- Lifetime Brands acquires S'well (ASI Central, 2022) · search the archive · Lifetime Brands bought S'well in March 2022; founded by Sarah Kauss in 2010
- S'well international shipping (Borderoo) · search the archive · S'well does not ship to all countries; Australian buyers directed to a parcel forwarder
- S'well (Wikipedia) · search the archive · Headquartered in Manhattan; founded 2010 by Sarah Kauss
Published by S'well or its owner
- S'well for Business - FAQ · search the archive · Bottles designed in New York City and 'responsibly made in China'
Company details
- Headquarters
- United States
- Last researched
- 3 November 2026
- Cite this page
- Labour Lens, "Is S'well ethical? Labour rating", https://www.labourlens.net/brand/swell, last researched 3 November 2026, accessed [date].
- Method
- Researched with AI assistance against published rules. How we check · What Lacks transparency means
Better-graded cookware and tableware
Something missing or wrong?
Grades are opinions based on the evidence listed here. Send us evidence, or a right of reply if you represent S'well.