Spell
Lacks transparency. Publishes some details, but doesn't show its workers are paid and treated fairly.
Last researched 2 November 2026 · 5 sources
Byron Bay label selling bohemian dresses and swimwear.
There's no proof Spell pays more than the legal minimum, which in China is below a living wage.
Better-graded swimwear and surf
Graded higher than Spell, selling the same kinds of things.
No swimwear and surf brand selling new goods is Good yet. These are the strongest so far.
Know something we've missed? Send evidence. Represent Spell? Send a right of reply.
Compare Spell with another brand
Why it's graded Lacks transparency
- Not met: Meets 3 of 6 Good requirements.
- Holds the grade back: It doesn't show that workers are paid a living wage, and isn't certified as working towards one. On Track needs at least one of these.
- It isn't Harm on record, because there's no serious confirmed problem on its record.
- Lacks transparency is still a poor grade: in supply chains like this, workers who can't be seen to be treated fairly are usually underpaid or unprotected.
Good requirements 3 of 6
- Not met: Pays a living wage, or holds a strong fair-pay certificationLiving wage: no evidence
- Not met: Respects worker rightsJudged on where its products are made: worker rights are poorly protected in China, Vietnam and India.
- Met: Supply chain independently audited or certified, or at least 80% made in countries with strong labour standards
- Met: No child or forced labour findings or links
- Met: Names the factories or farms that make its products, or is fully certified by a scheme that holds and audits that listPublishes its supplier list
- Not met: High-risk raw materials (cotton and leather) traced or certified, or not a major part of its rangeNot traced or certified: cotton
Red flags 1
- Red flag: No evidence it pays a living wage
Stars it would earn as Good
None yet. Stars only show on Good companies. About stars
Where it's made
China has the largest share, 73%. Vietnam is next, at 14%.
| Country | Share | Worker rights | Legal minimum wage | Forced labour risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| China | 73% | No guarantee of rights | Below a living wage | Moderate |
| Vietnam | 14% | Systematic violations | Well below a living wage | Moderate |
| India | 9% | No guarantee of rights | Well below a living wage | High |
| Peru | 2% | Systematic violations | Well below a living wage | Moderate |
| Cambodia | 2% | No guarantee of rights | Far below a living wage | Moderate |
Evidence
What we found
- Publishes supplier list
- Modern slavery statement
- Independent social audits of all its main factories
- Doesn't show where its cotton comes from. Cotton is linked to forced labour in Xinjiang and Turkmenistan, and child labour in several growing regions, so it can't be graded Good until it traces or certifies it.
- Uses leather in only a few products and doesn't show where it comes from. That doesn't count against it for Good, but the "Open supply chain" star needs all of it traced, certified or upcycled.
Research notes Spell's FY23 impact report names its 19 tier 1 factories: production was 73% China, 14% Vietnam, 9% India, 2% Peru and 2% Cambodia. 94% of tier 1 suppliers had a social audit or certificate (SA8000, SMETA, amfori BSCI, WRAP, WFTO). Spell says all pay at least the legal minimum and 28% pay at or above a calculated living wage, but this is self-reported and it sets no living wage target. Leather (3% of fibre) comes from LWG-certified tanneries. It publishes a voluntary modern slavery statement and is not in the 2026 Ethical Fashion Report.
What independent sources say
Sources and actions
Sources 5
Show all 5 sources
- SPELL (IPEA Holdings Pty Ltd - Spell Group) - B Corp directory · search the archive · Certified B Corp since August 2023, B Impact score 87.9 (workers 19.9)
- Ethical Fashion Guide 2026 (Baptist World Aid) · search the archive · Spell is not among the brands rated in the 2026 Ethical Fashion Report
Published by Spell or its owner
- Spell FY23 Impact Report · search the archive · FY23: CN 73%, VN 14%, IN 9%, PE 2%, KH 2%; 19 named tier 1 factories; 94.4% social audited; 28% pay living wage (self-reported); leather 2.8%
- Spell Modern Slavery Statement 2023 · search the archive · Voluntary FY23 statement: 18 tier 1 suppliers in China, India, Vietnam, Peru, Cambodia; incident response policy; no cases reported
- Spell - Meet the Makers · search the archive · Describes tier 1 suppliers by type and city and their audit schemes
Company details
- Headquarters
- Australia
- Last researched
- 2 November 2026
- Cite this page
- Labour Lens, "Is Spell ethical? Labour rating", https://www.labourlens.net/brand/spell, last researched 2 November 2026, accessed [date].
- Method
- Researched with AI assistance against published rules. How we check · What Lacks transparency means
Something missing or wrong?
Grades are opinions based on the evidence listed here. Send us evidence, or a right of reply if you represent Spell.
