Labour Lens

Lacks transparency. Publishes some details, but doesn't show its workers are paid and treated fairly.

Last researched 3 November 2026 · 6 sources

Sydney specialty coffee roaster.

There's no proof the people who grow its coffee earn more than the legal minimum, which in Colombia is well below a living wage, and Single O has no full independent audit.

Know something we've missed? Send evidence. Represent Single O? Send a right of reply.

Compare Single O with another brand

Why it's graded Lacks transparency

  • Not met: Meets 1 of 5 Good requirements.
  • Holds the grade back: It doesn't show that workers are paid a living wage, and isn't certified as working towards one. On Track needs at least one of these.
  • It isn't Harm on record, because there's no serious confirmed problem on its record.
  • Lacks transparency is still a poor grade: in supply chains like this, workers who can't be seen to be treated fairly are usually underpaid or unprotected.

How grades are decided


Good requirements 1 of 5

  • Not met: Pays a living wage, or holds a strong fair-pay certificationLiving wage: no evidence
  • Not met: Respects worker rightsSome of its coffee is grown in countries such as Colombia and Indonesia, where unions are heavily restricted, and it has no full supply chain audit.
  • Not met: Supply chain independently audited or certified, or at least 80% made in countries with strong labour standards
  • Met: No child or forced labour findings or links
  • Not met: Names the factories or farms that make its products, or is fully certified by a scheme that holds and audits that list

Red flags 2

  • Red flag: No evidence it pays a living wage
  • Red flag: Made partly in countries with poor worker rights, without a full independent audit of its supply chain

Stars it would earn as Good

None yet. Stars only show on Good companies. About stars

Estimates for its products

Our rules applied to one kind of product at a time, using Single O's evidence and, where it has product lines, that line's countries. They're estimates: we don't know which factory made any single item.

  • A product carrying the Fairtrade mark: Good

Holding one? Scan its barcode for an estimate that uses its care label or ingredients.

Where its coffee is grown

Single O names some of the countries its coffee comes from: Bolivia, Colombia, Ethiopia and Peru. The rest is shown as where coffee is usually grown.

Where its coffee is grown, and conditions there
CountryWorker rightsLegal minimum wageForced labour risk
BrazilUsual for the industrySystematic violationsBelow a living wageModerate
ColombiaNo guarantee of rightsWell below a living wageModerate
VietnamUsual for the industrySystematic violationsWell below a living wageModerate
EthiopiaSystematic violationsFar below a living wageModerate
PeruSystematic violationsWell below a living wageModerate
BoliviaRegular violationsNot ratedModerate
IndonesiaUsual for the industryNo guarantee of rightsWell below a living wageModerate
HondurasUsual for the industryNo guarantee of rightsWell below a living wageModerate
UgandaUsual for the industrySystematic violationsFar below a living wageModerate
GuatemalaUsual for the industryNo guarantee of rightsWell below a living wageModerate

Evidence

What we found

  • Risk across the industry, not a finding about this company: coffee is on the US Department of Labor child or forced labour list for over a dozen countries, and farm-gate prices often fall below a living income. (partly offset by certification or direct sourcing)
  • Direct trade (self-reported)

Research notes Single O says it buys most of its coffees directly from estates, farms, co-operatives and washing stations, topped up through exporters and importers, and said in 2025 that it pays farmers about 2.28 times the commodity price on average. Its current single origins come from Bolivia, Colombia, Ethiopia and Peru, but blends name no origins and it publishes no farm list, per-lot prices or country shares. It became a Certified B Corp in 2025. No labour abuses linked to its supply chain have been reported.

What independent sources say

SourceResultDetails
B Corp directoryCertifiedSingle O was certified as a B Corp in April 2025 with a score of 90.7 (Workers 24.6, Community 22.4). View
Australian Modern Slavery RegisterNot coveredSingle O is below the A$100 million revenue threshold for Australian modern slavery reporting and has not lodged a statement. View
Fairtrade (incl. FLOCERT and Fairtrade ANZ)Not listedSingle O does not sell Fairtrade or Rainforest Alliance certified coffee; it buys specialty lots directly and through exporters and importers. View
US Department of Labor goods listsListedCoffee from Colombia and several other Latin American and African origins is listed for child labour. View

Sources and actions

Sources 6

Show all 6 sources
  1. Single O (B Lab directory) · search the archive · Certified B Corp April 2025, score 90.7; cafés in Sydney, Brisbane and Tokyo; supports World Coffee Research.
  2. US DOL List of Goods Produced by Child Labor or Forced Labor · search the archive · Coffee from several Latin American and African origins listed for child labour.
  3. Single O celebrates 20 years with free coffee (BeanScene) · search the archive · Founded 2003 in Surry Hills as Single Origin Roasters; shares producer information with customers.
  4. Australia's Single O heralds sustainability progress with B Corp certification (World Coffee Portal, 2025) · search the archive · B Corp score 90.7 (2025); pays farmers about 2.28 times the C price

Published by Single O or its owner

  1. Sourcing coffee at Single O · search the archive · Most coffees sourced directly, topped up via exporters and importers; no farm list, prices or countries
  2. Single O shop · search the archive · Current single origins from Colombia, Bolivia, Peru and Ethiopia; blends name no origins

Company details

Headquarters
Australia
Last researched
3 November 2026
Cite this page
Labour Lens, "Is Single O ethical? Labour rating", https://www.labourlens.net/brand/single-o, last researched 3 November 2026, accessed [date].
Method
Researched with AI assistance against published rules. How we check · What Lacks transparency means

Better-graded beans and roasters

Something missing or wrong?

Grades are opinions based on the evidence listed here. Send us evidence, or a right of reply if you represent Single O.