Labour Lens

ROYCE' Chocolate

Lacks transparency

Lacks transparency. Publishes some details, but doesn't show its workers are paid and treated fairly.

Last researched 3 November 2026 · 6 sources

Japanese chocolate maker known for nama chocolate.

ROYCE' Chocolate can't show that the people who grow its cocoa in Ghana and Colombia earn a living wage, which workers there are very unlikely to.

Also worth knowing

It has no full independent audit.

Know something we've missed? Send evidence. Represent ROYCE' Chocolate? Send a right of reply.

Compare ROYCE' Chocolate with another brand

Why it's graded Lacks transparency

  • Not met: Meets 1 of 6 Good requirements.
  • Holds the grade back: It has 2 red flags: no evidence of a living wage and a hidden, unaudited supply chain in high-risk countries. Two or more red flags means a poor grade.
  • It isn't Harm on record, because there's no serious confirmed problem on its record.
  • Lacks transparency is still a poor grade: in supply chains like this, workers who can't be seen to be treated fairly are usually underpaid or unprotected.

How grades are decided


Good requirements 1 of 6

  • Not met: Pays a living wage, or holds a strong fair-pay certificationLiving wage: no evidence
  • Not met: Respects worker rightsSome of its cocoa is grown in countries such as Colombia and Ecuador, where unions are heavily restricted, and it has no full supply chain audit.
  • Not met: Supply chain independently audited or certified, or at least 80% made in countries with strong labour standards
  • Met: No child or forced labour findings or links
  • Not met: Names the factories or farms that make its products, or is fully certified by a scheme that holds and audits that list
  • Not met: Finds and fixes child labour on cocoa farms (Fairtrade, Fair for Life or its own published monitoring), and traces other high-risk ingredients where they're a major part of its range

Red flags 2

  • Red flag: No evidence it pays a living wage
  • Red flag: Hidden supply chain, partly in countries with poor worker rights

Stars it would earn as Good

None yet. Stars only show on Good companies. About stars

Estimates for its products

Our rules applied to one kind of product at a time, using ROYCE' Chocolate's evidence and, where it has product lines, that line's countries. They're estimates: we don't know which factory made any single item.

  • A product carrying the Fairtrade mark: Good

Holding one? Scan its barcode for an estimate that uses its care label or ingredients.

Where its cocoa is grown

ROYCE' Chocolate says its cocoa comes from Colombia. Product labels show Ghana. The rest is shown as where cocoa is usually grown.

Where its cocoa is grown, share by country, and conditions there
CountryShareWorker rightsLegal minimum wageForced labour risk
GhanaNot givenStrong protectionsWell below a living wageLow
Côte d'IvoireUsual for the industry32%Regular violationsFar below a living wageModerate
ColombiaNot givenNo guarantee of rightsWell below a living wageModerate
EcuadorUsual for the industry7%No guarantee of rightsWell below a living wageModerate
CameroonUsual for the industry7%Systematic violationsFar below a living wageModerate
NigeriaUsual for the industry4%No guarantee of rightsFar below a living wageModerate
IndonesiaUsual for the industry3%No guarantee of rightsWell below a living wageModerate

Evidence

What we found

  • Risk across the industry, not a finding about this company: an estimated 1.5 million children work on cocoa farms in Côte d'Ivoire and Ghana, and most cocoa farmers earn well below a living income.
  • It doesn't show that it checks cocoa farms for child labour and fixes what it finds.

Research notes ROYCE' makes all its products at its own factory in Hokkaido, Japan, but does not say where most of its cocoa is grown. It owns a cacao farm in Colombia, run by a local partner company since 2014, sells a Ghana-branded chocolate line and is a member of the World Cocoa Foundation. It names no certification, supplier list, child labour policy or monitoring, wage data or modern slavery statement. No labour abuses linked to its suppliers have been reported.

What independent sources say

SourceResultDetails
Chocolate ScorecardNot coveredNot among the companies invited to the 2026 Chocolate Scorecard, which covers companies buying over 1,000 tonnes of cocoa a year. View
Fairtrade (incl. FLOCERT and Fairtrade ANZ)Not listedROYCE' names no Fairtrade or Rainforest Alliance certification for its cocoa. View

Sources and actions

Sources 6

Show all 6 sources
  1. 7th edition Chocolate Scorecard: who is participating · search the archive · ROYCE' not among companies invited to the 2026 Chocolate Scorecard
  2. ROYCE' Ghana Sweet Chocolate (Pinkoi) · search the archive · ROYCE' sells a Ghana-branded chocolate line
  3. ROYCE' Fruit bar chocolate (Wafuu, Australian store) · search the archive · ROYCE' products sold online priced in AUD for Australian buyers
  4. Royce' (Wikipedia) · search the archive · Private company in Sapporo founded by Yasuhiro Yamazaki; stores in 16 countries outside Japan

Published by ROYCE' Chocolate or its owner

  1. Sustainability policy (ROYCE') · search the archive · Cocoa sourced through World Cocoa Foundation membership and own Colombian farm run by a local partner; all products made in Hokkaido
  2. ROYCE' champions sustainability and ethical production · search the archive · Own Colombian cacao farm since 2014; WCF member; no certifications or child labour policy named

Company details

Headquarters
Japan
Last researched
3 November 2026
Cite this page
Labour Lens, "Is ROYCE' Chocolate ethical? Labour rating", https://www.labourlens.net/brand/royce-chocolate, last researched 3 November 2026, accessed [date].
Method
Researched with AI assistance against published rules. How we check · What Lacks transparency means

Better-graded chocolate

Something missing or wrong?

Grades are opinions based on the evidence listed here. Send us evidence, or a right of reply if you represent ROYCE' Chocolate.