Royal Albert
Lacks transparency. Publishes some details, but doesn't show its workers are paid and treated fairly.
Last researched 3 November 2026 · 7 sources
English bone china brand known for Old Country Roses.
Royal Albert can't show that the workers who make its products in Indonesia earn a living wage, which workers there are very unlikely to.
Also worth knowing
It has no full independent audit.
Better-graded cookware and tableware
Graded higher than Royal Albert, selling the same kinds of things.
Know something we've missed? Send evidence. Represent Royal Albert? Send a right of reply.
Compare Royal Albert with another brand
Why it's graded Lacks transparency
- Not met: Meets 3 of 6 Good requirements.
- Holds the grade back: It has 2 red flags: no evidence of a living wage and unaudited production in high-risk countries. Two or more red flags means a poor grade.
- It isn't Harm on record, because there's no serious confirmed problem on its record.
- Lacks transparency is still a poor grade: in supply chains like this, workers who can't be seen to be treated fairly are usually underpaid or unprotected.
Good requirements 3 of 6
- Not met: Pays a living wage, or holds a strong fair-pay certificationLiving wage: no evidence
- Not met: Respects worker rightsMost of its products are made in countries such as Indonesia and China, where unions are heavily restricted, and it has no full supply chain audit.
- Not met: Supply chain independently audited or certified, or at least 80% made in countries with strong labour standards
- Met: No child or forced labour findings or links
- Met: Names the factories or farms that make its products, or is fully certified by a scheme that holds and audits that listMakes its products in its own factories
- Met: High-risk raw materials (such as timber and cotton) traced or certified, or not a major part of its rangeNone recorded in a major share of its range
Red flags 2
- Red flag: No evidence it pays a living wage
- Red flag: Made mostly in countries with poor worker rights, without a full independent audit of its supply chain
Stars it would earn as Good
None yet. Stars only show on Good companies. About stars
Where it's made
From Royal Albert's own disclosure: it makes its products in its own factories. Its list covers only part of its range. The rest is shown as where homewares and appliances are usually made.
| Country | Worker rights | Legal minimum wage | Forced labour risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | No guarantee of rights | Well below a living wage | Moderate |
| ChinaUsual for the industry | No guarantee of rights | Below a living wage | Moderate |
| VietnamUsual for the industry | Systematic violations | Well below a living wage | Moderate |
| IndiaUsual for the industry | No guarantee of rights | Well below a living wage | High |
| PolandUsual for the industry | Regular violations | Close to a living wage | Moderate |
| MalaysiaUsual for the industry | No guarantee of rights | Below a living wage | Moderate |
Evidence
What we found
- No high-risk raw materials (such as timber and cotton) are recorded in a major share of its range, so the raw-material check doesn't hold it back for Good.
- Owns or runs its own production
- Modern slavery statement
Research notes Royal Albert's St Mary's Works in Stoke-on-Trent closed in 1998 and UK production ended in 2002, when it moved to Royal Doulton's plant in Indonesia, the Fiskars-owned PT Doulton factory in Balaraja, Tangerang, which also makes Wedgwood and Royal Doulton. Fiskars Group audits outside suppliers through amfori BSCI and Sedex but publishes no supplier list, audit results or living wage commitment. No labour abuses tied to Royal Albert products have been reported.
What independent sources say
| Source | Result | Details |
|---|---|---|
| UK Modern Slavery Statement Registry | Listed | Covered by Fiskars Group's 2025 modern slavery statement: about 140 finished goods suppliers, amfori BSCI and Sedex membership, no confirmed forced or child labour in 2025. View |
| Baptist World Aid Ethical Fashion Report | Not covered | Baptist World Aid's Ethical Fashion and Electronics reports do not assess tableware brands like Royal Albert. View |
Sources and actions
Sources 7
Show all 7 sources
- Royal Albert - Grace's Guide to British Industrial History · search the archive · St Mary's Works closed 1998; production moved to Doulton factories and Doulton's Indonesian plant; UK production ended December 2002
- Royal Albert ceramics - Carters · search the archive · Royal Albert production moved to Indonesia in 2002; owned by WWRD, now part of Fiskars
- Company information - Royal Doulton Australia · search the archive · Waterford, Wedgwood, Royal Doulton and Royal Albert brands are part of the Fiskars portfolio
- Fiskars Group jobs - JobStreet Indonesia · search the archive · PT Doulton in Balaraja, Tangerang, is a Fiskars Group ceramic tableware manufacturing facility
- Royal Albert Old Country Roses plate set (Myer) · search the archive · Royal Albert tableware sold by Myer in Australia
Published by Royal Albert or its owner
- Fiskars Group Supply Chain Due Diligence and Modern Slavery Statement 2025 · search the archive · About 140 finished goods suppliers; amfori BSCI and Sedex member; no confirmed forced or child labour in 2025
- Royal Albert Old Country Roses bowl set (Wedgwood) · search the archive · Royal Albert still sold as its own brand of fine bone china
Company details
- Owned by
- Fiskars Group (Finland)
- Headquarters
- United Kingdom
- Last researched
- 3 November 2026
- Cite this page
- Labour Lens, "Is Royal Albert ethical? Labour rating", https://www.labourlens.net/brand/royal-albert, last researched 3 November 2026, accessed [date].
- Method
- Researched with AI assistance against published rules. How we check · What Lacks transparency means
Something missing or wrong?
Grades are opinions based on the evidence listed here. Send us evidence, or a right of reply if you represent Royal Albert.