Labour Lens

ROTATE Birger Christensen

Lacks transparency

Lacks transparency. Publishes some details, but doesn't show its workers are paid and treated fairly.

Last researched 3 November 2026 · 6 sources

Copenhagen womenswear label selling party dresses.

There's no proof ROTATE Birger Christensen pays more than the legal minimum, which in China is below a living wage, and it has no full independent audit.

Know something we've missed? Send evidence. Represent ROTATE Birger Christensen? Send a right of reply.

Compare ROTATE Birger Christensen with another brand

Why it's graded Lacks transparency

  • Not met: Meets 2 of 6 Good requirements.
  • Holds the grade back: It has 2 red flags: no evidence of a living wage and unaudited production in high-risk countries. Two or more red flags means a poor grade.
  • It isn't Harm on record, because there's no serious confirmed problem on its record.
  • Lacks transparency is still a poor grade: in supply chains like this, workers who can't be seen to be treated fairly are usually underpaid or unprotected.

How grades are decided


Good requirements 2 of 6

  • Not met: Pays a living wage, or holds a strong fair-pay certificationLiving wage: no evidence
  • Not met: Respects worker rightsMost of its products are made in countries such as China and Bangladesh, where unions are heavily restricted, and it has no full supply chain audit.
  • Not met: Supply chain independently audited or certified, or at least 80% made in countries with strong labour standards
  • Met: No child or forced labour findings or links
  • Not met: Names the factories or farms that make its products, or is fully certified by a scheme that holds and audits that list
  • Met: High-risk raw materials (cotton) traced or certified, or not a major part of its rangeOnly in a few products: cotton

Red flags 2

  • Red flag: No evidence it pays a living wage
  • Red flag: Made mostly in countries with poor worker rights, without a full independent audit of its supply chain

Stars it would earn as Good

None yet. Stars only show on Good companies. About stars

Where it's made

From product labels; ROTATE Birger Christensen doesn't say where its products are made. The rest is shown as where clothes and shoes are usually made.

Where it's made, and conditions there
CountryWorker rightsLegal minimum wageForced labour risk
ChinaNo guarantee of rightsBelow a living wageModerate
BangladeshUsual for the industryNo guarantee of rightsFar below a living wageModerate
VietnamUsual for the industrySystematic violationsWell below a living wageModerate
IndiaUsual for the industryNo guarantee of rightsWell below a living wageHigh
CambodiaUsual for the industryNo guarantee of rightsFar below a living wageModerate
TürkiyeUsual for the industryNo guarantee of rightsBelow a living wageVery high
IndonesiaUsual for the industryNo guarantee of rightsWell below a living wageModerate
PakistanUsual for the industryNo guarantee of rightsFar below a living wageHigh

Evidence

What we found

  • Uses cotton in only a few products, so the raw-material check doesn't hold it back for Good. It doesn't show where its cotton comes from. The "Open supply chain" star needs all of it traced, certified or upcycled.

Research notes ROTATE's parent, Birger Christensen A/S, has been a Certified B Corp since 2024 with a score of 88.9, and the B Lab listing names ROTATE as one of its brands. ROTATE publishes no supplier list, factory countries, audit results or living wage commitment; retailer labels for its dresses say made in China, so production is shown from those labels only and its full spread of countries is unknown. Most of the range is polyester and sequinned eveningwear, with organic cotton used in a smaller loungewear line. No labour abuse findings linked to ROTATE's suppliers have been reported.

What independent sources say

SourceResultDetails
B Corp directoryCertifiedParent company Birger Christensen A/S, which lists ROTATE as a brand, has been a Certified B Corp since 2024 with a score of 88.9. View
Business & Human Rights Resource CentreNot listedNo supply chain labour allegations against ROTATE found. View

Sources and actions

Sources 6

Show all 6 sources
  1. B Lab directory: Birger Christensen A/S · search the archive · Certified B Corp since 2024; brands listed are Birger Christensen, Birger Christensen Collective and ROTATE.
  2. Birger Christensen Collective announces B Corp certification (FashionUnited) · search the archive · Collective owning Rotate and Remain scored 88.9; supplier environmental audits and traceability policies are future goals.
  3. Mytheresa: Rotate Birger Christensen Bridal Leia ruched maxi dress · search the archive · 100% polyester; made in China.
  4. Mytheresa: Rotate Birger Christensen sequined midi dress · search the archive · 95% polyester, 5% elastane; made in China.
  5. eBay: Rotate Birger Christensen Herla strapless dress · search the archive · Faux leather dress; country of origin China.
  6. Rotate Birger Christensen Sunday loungewear collection (Hypebae) · search the archive · Loungewear line made from organic cotton or recycled polyester.

Company details

Headquarters
Denmark
Last researched
3 November 2026
Cite this page
Labour Lens, "Is ROTATE Birger Christensen ethical? Labour rating", https://www.labourlens.net/brand/rotate, last researched 3 November 2026, accessed [date].
Method
Researched with AI assistance against published rules. How we check · What Lacks transparency means

Better-graded everyday fashion

Something missing or wrong?

Grades are opinions based on the evidence listed here. Send us evidence, or a right of reply if you represent ROTATE Birger Christensen.