Ritchies Supermarkets
Lacks transparency. Publishes some details, but doesn't show its workers are paid and treated fairly.
Last researched 3 November 2026 · 3 sources
Family-founded supermarket and liquor chain in Victoria, NSW and Queensland.
Until Ritchies Supermarkets has the farms and labour hire firms behind its food checked independently and publishes what it finds, it can't show that the people who grow and pack it are paid what they're owed.
Know something we've missed? Send evidence. Represent Ritchies Supermarkets? Send a right of reply.
Compare Ritchies Supermarkets with another brand
Why it's graded Lacks transparency
- Not met: Meets 2 of 6 Good requirements.
- Holds the grade back: It sells fresh and own-brand food from farms and labour hire firms it hasn't shown it checks. That alone means a poor grade until it takes steps to check them.
- It isn't Harm on record, because there's no serious confirmed problem on its record.
- Lacks transparency is still a poor grade: in supply chains like this, workers who can't be seen to be treated fairly are usually underpaid or unprotected.
Good requirements 2 of 6
- Not met: Pays a living wage, or holds a strong fair-pay certificationLiving wage: no evidence
- Met: Respects worker rights
- Not met: Supply chain independently audited or certified, or at least 80% made in countries with strong labour standards
- Met: No child or forced labour findings or links
- Not met: Names the factories or farms that make its products, or is fully certified by a scheme that holds and audits that list
- Not met: Farm and labour hire checks published
Red flags 2
- Red flag: No evidence it pays a living wage
- Red flag: Sells food from farms and labour hire firms it doesn't check
- Red flag: Fails its category's raw-material check (means Lacks transparency)
Stars it would earn as Good
None yet. Stars only show on Good companies. About stars
Where it's made
Ritchies Supermarkets names some of the countries it makes in: Australia. The rest is shown as where own-brand and fresh food is usually grown or made.
| Country | Worker rights | Legal minimum wage | Forced labour risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Australia | Strong protections | About a living wage | Low |
| ChinaUsual for the industry | No guarantee of rights | Below a living wage | Moderate |
| New ZealandUsual for the industry | Strong protections | About a living wage | Low |
| ThailandUsual for the industry | No guarantee of rights | Below a living wage | Moderate |
| ItalyUsual for the industry | Strong protections | Close to a living wage | Low |
| VietnamUsual for the industry | Systematic violations | Well below a living wage | Moderate |
| MalaysiaUsual for the industry | No guarantee of rights | Below a living wage | Moderate |
| IndiaUsual for the industry | No guarantee of rights | Well below a living wage | High |
Evidence
What we found
- Risk across the industry, not a finding about this company: fresh and own-brand food relies on Australian farms and meatworks where labour hire firms have underpaid migrant workers, and on imported ingredients such as tomato paste, palm oil and seafood linked to forced labour.
- Modern slavery statement
- Being made in Australia doesn't count towards a living wage or audit here: Australian farm and meat work, where a NSW parliamentary inquiry, the Fair Work Ombudsman and the supermarkets' own audits have found labour hire firms underpaying migrant workers. It would need to publish its suppliers or have them independently audited.
- Relies on fresh and own-brand food from farms and meatworks where labour hire firms have underpaid migrant workers, paid them in cash and charged them for crowded housing, often out of sight of supermarket audits. It hasn't shown any checks on the farms, meatworks and labour hire firms behind its fresh and own-brand food, so it's graded Lacks transparency until it does.
Research notes Ritchies runs 75 to 78 supermarkets and liquor stores, all under the IGA banner. Its 2023 modern slavery statement says Metcash supplies about 70% of its products and about 1,000 other suppliers the rest, and it does random desktop audits of those suppliers. It names no countries, farm or factory audits or repayments; a cacao line was dropped after a customer raised modern slavery concerns.
What independent sources say
| Source | Result | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Australian Modern Slavery Register | Listed | Ritchies Stores Pty Ltd lodged a 2023 modern slavery statement; it says Metcash supplies about 70% of products, about 1,000 other suppliers provide the rest, and it runs random desktop audits of them; it reports no worker findings or repayments. View |
Sources and actions
Sources 3
Show all 3 sources
Published by Ritchies Supermarkets or its owner
- Ritchies Stores Modern Slavery Statement 2023 · search the archive · Reporting entity Ritchies Stores Pty Ltd; 75 stores; Metcash supplies about 70%; random desktop audits; cacao line discontinued
- Ritchies acquisitions and corporate update (2 June 2023) · search the archive · 78 supermarkets and 67 liquor stores after the Corcoris acquisition
- Ritchies Supermarkets · search the archive · Official site; operating entity Ritchies Stores Pty Ltd
Company details
- Owned by
- Ritchies Stores Pty Ltd
- Headquarters
- Australia
- Last researched
- 3 November 2026
- Cite this page
- Labour Lens, "Is Ritchies Supermarkets ethical? Labour rating", https://www.labourlens.net/brand/ritchies, last researched 3 November 2026, accessed [date].
- Method
- Researched with AI assistance against published rules. How we check · What Lacks transparency means
Other supermarkets brands
Nothing we've rated in supermarkets is better than Lacks transparency yet.
Something missing or wrong?
Grades are opinions based on the evidence listed here. Send us evidence, or a right of reply if you represent Ritchies Supermarkets.