Labour Lens

PrettyLittleThing

Lacks transparency

Lacks transparency. Publishes some details, but doesn't show its workers are paid and treated fairly.

Last researched 2 November 2026 · 6 sources

Manchester online fast-fashion retailer.

There's no proof PrettyLittleThing pays more than the legal minimum, which in China is below a living wage.

Know something we've missed? Send evidence. Represent PrettyLittleThing? Send a right of reply.

Compare PrettyLittleThing with another brand

Why it's graded Lacks transparency

  • Not met: Meets 3 of 6 Good requirements.
  • Holds the grade back: It doesn't show that workers are paid a living wage, and isn't certified as working towards one. On Track needs at least one of these.
  • It isn't Harm on record: the most serious problem on its record (unpaid or underpaid wages, last recorded in 2020) is more than 5 years old.
  • Lacks transparency is still a poor grade: in supply chains like this, workers who can't be seen to be treated fairly are usually underpaid or unprotected.

How grades are decided


Good requirements 3 of 6

  • Not met: Pays a living wage, or holds a strong fair-pay certificationLiving wage: no evidence
  • Not met: Respects worker rightsJudged on where its products are made: worker rights are poorly protected in China, Pakistan and India.
  • Met: Supply chain independently audited or certified, or at least 80% made in countries with strong labour standards
  • Met: No child or forced labour findings or links
  • Met: Names the factories or farms that make its products, or is fully certified by a scheme that holds and audits that listPublishes its supplier list
  • Not met: High-risk raw materials (cotton) traced or certified, or not a major part of its rangeNot traced or certified: cotton

Red flags 1

  • Red flag: No evidence it pays a living wage

Stars it would earn as Good

None yet. Stars only show on Good companies. About stars

Where it's made

China has the largest share, 51%. Pakistan is next, at 12%.

Where it's made, share by country, and conditions there
CountryShareWorker rightsLegal minimum wageForced labour risk
China51%No guarantee of rightsBelow a living wageModerate
Pakistan12%No guarantee of rightsFar below a living wageHigh
India11%No guarantee of rightsWell below a living wageHigh
Türkiye10%No guarantee of rightsBelow a living wageVery high
United Kingdom6%Regular violationsClose to a living wageLow
Bangladesh3%No guarantee of rightsFar below a living wageModerate
Morocco3%Regular violationsWell below a living wageLow
Italy2%Strong protectionsClose to a living wageLow
Egypt1%No guarantee of rightsWell below a living wageModerate
Vietnam1%Systematic violationsWell below a living wageModerate

Evidence

What we found

  • Publishes supplier list
  • Signed the International Accord on garment factory safety
  • Modern slavery statement
  • Independent social audits of all its main factories
  • Doesn't show where its cotton comes from. Cotton is linked to forced labour in Xinjiang and Turkmenistan, and child labour in several growing regions, so it can't be graded Good until it traces or certifies it.

Research notes PrettyLittleThing buys from the same supplier base as the rest of Debenhams Group (formerly boohoo group), whose published factory list includes PLT. Of the group's 525 Tier 1 factories in 2025, 51% were in China, with most of the rest in Pakistan, India, Turkey and the UK. The group signs the International Accord and requires annual third-party audits, but it has no living wage commitment, and PLT scored 29/100 in the 2026 Ethical Fashion Report, below the 31.5 average.

What independent sources say

SourceResultDetails
Baptist World Aid Ethical Fashion ReportListedPrettyLittleThing scored 29 out of 100 in the 2026 Ethical Fashion Report (average 31.5), the same as its owner Debenhams Group, which completed the survey; the group scored 26 in 2024. View
Fashion Transparency Index (Fashion Revolution)ListedParent boohoo group scored 24% in the 2023 Fashion Transparency Index, below the 26% average. View
UK Modern Slavery Statement RegistryListedCovered by Debenhams Group's 2025 UK modern slavery statement, which lists 525 Tier 1 factories, about half in China, with annual third-party audits required. View
Business & Human Rights Resource CentreListedRecords the 2020 independent Levitt review of the boohoo group's Leicester supply chain, which found pay and conditions allegations substantially true. View
News reporting and NGO investigationsListedRated with its parent boohoo group, which got the lowest possible grade in the Clean Clothes Campaign's 2019 Tailored Wages report, for showing no evidence that any worker making its clothes earned a living wage. Shop Ethical cites it in rating the group F (checked October 2026). View

Confirmed issues 1

Only confirmed problems are listed, and old ones drop off after 10 to 15 years. A problem the company has fully put right no longer counts against it, and nor does one it finds and is fixing itself. How problems are counted

Last recordedWhat happenedMade amends?
2020A 2020 independent review by Alison Levitt QC found reports of very low pay and poor conditions in the boohoo group's Leicester supply chain, which also made clothes for its other brands, 'substantially true' (BHRRC, 2020). Source · search the archivePartlyThe group accepted the review's recommendations, launched an 'Agenda for Change' programme and dropped 64 Leicester factories; no compensation for workers is reported.

Unconfirmed reports

Credible reports that haven't been confirmed by a regulator, completed investigation or the company. They're shown for your information and don't affect the grade.

  • A 2023 BBC Panorama investigation reported group buyers pushing suppliers for price cuts on orders already agreed and shortening lead times, which raises the risk of low pay and excessive hours; the group said these were standard industry practices (FashionUnited, 2023). Source
  • In 2025 UK suppliers told Drapers that the group was months behind on paying invoices and had cut up to 30% from agreed prices, claims that extended to PrettyLittleThing; such pressure raises the risk of low pay (Retail Gazette, 2025). Source

Sources and actions

Sources 6

Show all 6 sources
  1. Independent review into the boohoo Group plc's Leicester supply chain (BHRRC) · search the archive · Levitt review (2020) found low pay allegations substantially true and supply chain monitoring inadequate
  2. BooHoo - Good Shopping Guide (ethical.org.au) · search the archive · Debenhams Group (formerly boohoo) 29/100 in 2026 EFR (avg 31.5), 26 in 2024; rated F citing Tailored Wages 2019; FTI 2023 24%
  3. New investigation claims Boohoo breaks past promises of fair production (FashionUnited) · search the archive · Panorama 2023: price cuts on agreed orders and shortened lead times
  4. Suppliers slam Boohoo over unpaid invoices and sudden price cuts (Retail Gazette) · search the archive · Aug 2025: suppliers report months-late payments and up to 30% invoice deductions; claims extend to PrettyLittleThing
  5. Boohoo exits 64 Leicester factories over code of conduct breaches (City AM) · search the archive · The group dropped 64 Leicester factories after the 2020 scandal

Published by PrettyLittleThing or its owner

  1. Debenhams Group Modern Slavery Statement 2025 · search the archive · 525 Tier 1 factories: China 269, Pakistan 63, India 58, Turkey 52, UK 30; annual audits; fair wages policy in development

Company details

Headquarters
United Kingdom
Last researched
2 November 2026
Cite this page
Labour Lens, "Is PrettyLittleThing ethical? Labour rating", https://www.labourlens.net/brand/prettylittlething, last researched 2 November 2026, accessed [date].
Method
Researched with AI assistance against published rules. How we check · What Lacks transparency means

Better-graded everyday fashion

Something missing or wrong?

Grades are opinions based on the evidence listed here. Send us evidence, or a right of reply if you represent PrettyLittleThing.