Labour Lens

Lacks transparency. Publishes some details, but doesn't show its workers are paid and treated fairly.

Last researched 3 November 2026 · 4 sources

Dutch brand of shavers, toothbrushes and kitchen appliances.

There's no proof Philips pays more than the legal minimum, which in China is below a living wage, and it doesn't name the factories its Responsible Business Alliance audits cover.

Know something we've missed? Send evidence. Represent Philips? Send a right of reply.

Compare Philips with another brand

Why it's graded Lacks transparency

  • Not met: Meets 2 of 6 Good requirements.
  • Holds the grade back: It doesn't show that workers are paid a living wage, and isn't certified as working towards one. On Track needs at least one of these.
  • It isn't Harm on record, because there's no serious confirmed problem on its record.
  • Lacks transparency is still a poor grade: in supply chains like this, workers who can't be seen to be treated fairly are usually underpaid or unprotected.

How grades are decided


Good requirements 2 of 6

  • Not met: Pays a living wage, or holds a strong fair-pay certificationLiving wage: no evidence
  • Not met: Respects worker rightsSome of its products are made in countries such as China and India, where unions are heavily restricted, and it has no full supply chain audit.
  • Not met: Supply chain independently audited or certified, or at least 80% made in countries with strong labour standards
  • Met: No child or forced labour findings or links
  • Not met: Names the factories or farms that make its products, or is fully certified by a scheme that holds and audits that list
  • Met: High-risk raw materials (such as timber and cotton) traced or certified, or not a major part of its rangeNone recorded in a major share of its range

Red flags 2

  • Red flag: No evidence it pays a living wage
  • Red flag: Made partly in countries with poor worker rights, without a full independent audit of its supply chain

Stars it would earn as Good

None yet. Stars only show on Good companies. About stars

Where it's made

Philips names some of the countries it makes in: the Netherlands, Austria, China, Indonesia, Brazil, the United States, Italy, Romania and India. The rest is shown as where homewares and appliances are usually made.

Where it's made, and conditions there
CountryWorker rightsLegal minimum wageForced labour risk
ChinaNo guarantee of rightsBelow a living wageModerate
IndiaNo guarantee of rightsWell below a living wageHigh
IndonesiaNo guarantee of rightsWell below a living wageModerate
NetherlandsStrong protectionsAbout a living wageLow
AustriaStrong protectionsAbout a living wageLow
BrazilSystematic violationsBelow a living wageModerate
United StatesSystematic violationsBelow a living wageLow
ItalyStrong protectionsClose to a living wageLow
RomaniaRegular violationsBelow a living wageModerate
VietnamUsual for the industrySystematic violationsWell below a living wageModerate
PolandUsual for the industryRegular violationsClose to a living wageModerate
MalaysiaUsual for the industryNo guarantee of rightsBelow a living wageModerate

Evidence

What we found

  • No high-risk raw materials (such as timber and cotton) are recorded in a major share of its range, so the raw-material check doesn't hold it back for Good.
  • Modern slavery statement
  • Makes part of its range in its own factories

Research notes Philips shavers and toothbrushes come from Royal Philips' own Personal Health factories in the Netherlands, Austria, China, Indonesia, Brazil and the US, while Philips kitchen and home appliances are made by Versuni in its own factories in China, Brazil, Italy, Romania and India and by suppliers; neither says how production is split or publishes a supplier list. Both are Responsible Business Alliance members and audit suppliers in high-risk countries, and Royal Philips reports zero-tolerance audit findings each year (eight in 2025, on health and safety, wages, labour and environment), but neither has a living wage commitment.

What independent sources say

SourceResultDetails
Australian Modern Slavery RegisterListedPhilips Electronics Australia is covered by Royal Philips' modern slavery statement; the 2025 statement reports eight zero-tolerance supplier findings in 2025, four still being fixed. View
UK Modern Slavery Statement RegistryListedPhilips Electronics UK Limited files an annual modern slavery statement on the UK register, most recently for 2025. View

Sources and actions

Sources 4

Show all 4 sources
  1. Versuni Modern Slavery and Human Rights Statement 2024 · search the archive · Makes Philips-branded appliances; own factories in Brazil, Italy, Romania, India, China; RBA member; no forced or child labour found in 2024 audits

Published by Philips or its owner

  1. Philips Modern Slavery and Child Labour Statement 2025 · search the archive · FY2025: about 4,100 product suppliers; RBA member; 8 zero-tolerance findings, 4 open; no living wage commitment or supplier list; about 65,300 staff
  2. Philips Modern Slavery and Human Trafficking Statement FY2024 · search the archive · About 4,400 tier-one suppliers; RBA member; 8 zero-tolerance findings in 2024; no living wage or supplier list; about 67,800 staff
  3. Philips industrial sites 2024 · search the archive · Personal Health sites in Klagenfurt, Varginha, Zhuhai, Batam, Drachten and Ontario (CA)

Company details

Headquarters
Netherlands
Employees
About 65,300
Last researched
3 November 2026
Cite this page
Labour Lens, "Is Philips ethical? Labour rating", https://www.labourlens.net/brand/philips, last researched 3 November 2026, accessed [date].
Method
Researched with AI assistance against published rules. How we check · What Lacks transparency means

Better-graded appliances

Something missing or wrong?

Grades are opinions based on the evidence listed here. Send us evidence, or a right of reply if you represent Philips.