Labour Lens
Clothing & footwear · Leather shoes and accessories

Nisolo

Partly verified

Nisolo raises serious concerns: workers in the countries clothing & footwear usually comes from, such as China and Bangladesh are very unlikely to earn a living wage, and unions and workers' rights are heavily restricted in the countries clothing & footwear usually comes from, such as China and Bangladesh, with no independent audits.

Last researched 9 October 2026

Not doing enough. Workers in the supply chain are likely underpaid, unprotected or in danger, and in the worst cases face forced or child labour. Look for a better-graded alternative. What this grade means

Send evidenceRepresent Nisolo? Reply here

Good: 1 of 5

  • Pays a living wage
  • Respects worker rights
  • Full supply chain audit, or made only in countries with rigorous labour standards
  • No child or forced labour findings
  • Publishes where its products are made (supplier list, named farms or its own factories)

Great: 0 of 3

  • Pays beyond a living wage
  • Finds and fixes problems, or invests directly in workers' communities
  • Actively empowers workers

Needs all Good requirements plus two of these.

Red flags: 3

  • Does not pay a living wage
  • Hidden or unaudited supply chain (no certification or documentation, or major production in countries with poor worker rights without independent audits)
  • Failing or very low scores on independent ratings

Where it's made: not disclosed

Showing where clothing & footwear products are usually made instead.

CountryWorker rightsLegal wagesForced labour risk
China 30%Systematic violationsBelow a living wageModerate
Bangladesh 20%No guarantee of rightsFar below a living wageHigh
Vietnam 15%Systematic violationsWell below a living wageModerate
India 10%Systematic violationsWell below a living wageHigh
Cambodia 8%Systematic violationsFar below a living wageModerate
Türkiye 7%No guarantee of rightsBelow a living wageVery high
Indonesia 5%Systematic violationsWell below a living wageModerate
Pakistan 5%Systematic violationsFar below a living wageHigh

Country conditions from the ITUC Global Rights Index, Global Slavery Index and living wage benchmarks. Certifications and audits can raise a company above its countries' baseline.

Why this grade

  • Cotton is linked to forced labour (Xinjiang, Turkmenistan) and child labour in several growing regions.
  • Uses high-risk raw materials (e.g. leather tanning, mica, artisanal gold)
  • Low or failing score on an independent rating
  • Uses higher-risk raw materials such as leather that aren't traced to the farm. This is noted as a risk but doesn't decide the grade.

Nisolo went into foreclosure in January 2025 and its brand was bought by Project Bound Inc., led by IRL Ventures. The Peru factory it once owned, where Accountable had verified individual living wages, closed by January 2025. The brand no longer appears in the B Corp directory and does not say where its shoes are now made. Its sustainability page still describes the closed Peru factory and older living wage figures. Earlier wage claims for its partner factories in Mexico, Brazil and Kenya were checked by Nisolo itself, not independently. Good On You's 'Very Poor' People score reflects this lack of current information.

What independent sources say

SourceResultDetails
B Corp directoryNot listedCertified as a B Corp from 2017, but no longer listed in the B Corp directory; B Lab says the certification has lapsed. View ↗
US Department of Labor goods listsFoundBrazil cattle and footwear appear on the US Department of Labor list of goods made with child or forced labour; leather from Brazil is not listed separately. View ↗
Business & Human Rights Resource CentreUnclearNo reports about Nisolo appear on the Business & Human Rights Resource Centre. View ↗

Unconfirmed reports

Credible reports that haven't been confirmed by a regulator, completed investigation or the company. They're shown for your information and don't affect the grade.

  • Eco-Stylist reported in 2025 that when Nisolo's Peru factory closed in 2024-25, severance payments to its 57 workers stopped after the company's foreclosure, that about 28% who rejected the offer had received no severance, and that the new owners will not honour severance claims from before their takeover. Source ↗
Owned by
Project Bound Inc. (IRL Ventures)
Headquarters
United States

Sources (8)

Last researched 9 October 2026 · details still being verified. Grades are opinions based on the evidence listed here. Represent this company and think something is wrong? A right-of-reply form is coming soon.