Labour Lens

Lacks transparency. Publishes some details, but doesn't show its workers are paid and treated fairly.

Last researched 2 November 2026 · 6 sources

Australian women's label selling dresses, tops and separates.

Lulu & Rose's parent, Accent Group, scored 10/100 in the 2026 Ethical Fashion Report, and there's no proof it pays more than the legal minimum, which in China is below a living wage.

Know something we've missed? Send evidence. Represent Lulu & Rose? Send a right of reply.

Compare Lulu & Rose with another brand

Why it's graded Lacks transparency

  • Not met: Meets 2 of 6 Good requirements.
  • Holds the grade back: It has 2 red flags: no evidence of a living wage and a failing or very low rating (Ethical Fashion Report 10/100 in 2026, for the company it's rated with). Two or more red flags means a poor grade.
  • It isn't Harm on record, because there's no serious confirmed problem on its record.
  • Lacks transparency is still a poor grade: in supply chains like this, workers who can't be seen to be treated fairly are usually underpaid or unprotected.

How grades are decided


Good requirements 2 of 6

  • Not met: Pays a living wage, or holds a strong fair-pay certificationLiving wage: no evidence
  • Not met: Respects worker rightsJudged on where its products are made: worker rights are poorly protected in China, Bangladesh and Vietnam.
  • Met: Supply chain independently audited or certified, or at least 80% made in countries with strong labour standards
  • Met: No child or forced labour findings or links
  • Not met: Names the factories or farms that make its products, or is fully certified by a scheme that holds and audits that list
  • Not met: High-risk raw materials (cotton) traced or certified, or not a major part of its rangeNot traced or certified: cotton

Red flags 2

  • Red flag: No evidence it pays a living wage
  • Red flag: Failing or very low score on an independent rating: Ethical Fashion Report 10/100 (2026, the company it's rated with)

Stars it would earn as Good

None yet. Stars only show on Good companies. About stars

Where it's made

Lulu & Rose names some of the countries it makes in: China. The rest is shown as where clothes and shoes are usually made.

Where it's made, share by country, and conditions there
CountryShareWorker rightsLegal minimum wageForced labour risk
China93%No guarantee of rightsBelow a living wageModerate
BangladeshUsual for the industry2%No guarantee of rightsFar below a living wageModerate
VietnamUsual for the industry2%Systematic violationsWell below a living wageModerate
IndiaUsual for the industry1%No guarantee of rightsWell below a living wageHigh
CambodiaUsual for the industry1%No guarantee of rightsFar below a living wageModerate
TürkiyeUsual for the industry1%No guarantee of rightsBelow a living wageVery high
IndonesiaUsual for the industryunder 1%No guarantee of rightsWell below a living wageModerate
PakistanUsual for the industryunder 1%No guarantee of rightsFar below a living wageHigh

Evidence

What we found

  • Modern slavery statement
  • Independent social audits of all its main factories
  • Doesn't show where its cotton comes from. Cotton is linked to forced labour in Xinjiang and Turkmenistan, and child labour in several growing regions, so it can't be graded Good until it traces or certifies it.

Research notes Lulu & Rose is a women's fashion label that came to Accent Group with its 2021 purchase of Glue Store, which Accent finished closing in 2026. The label publishes nothing about where its clothes are made. Accent says its own brands use 80 factories, 90% in China, each with an independent social audit, with long working hours and machine safety the most common findings, but it publishes no factory list, has no living wage commitment and scored 10/100 in the 2026 Ethical Fashion Report.

What independent sources say

SourceResultDetails
Baptist World Aid Ethical Fashion ReportProblem foundOwner Accent Group scored 10 out of 100 in the 2026 Ethical Fashion Report (average 31.5), after 12 in 2024. View
Australian Modern Slavery RegisterListedCovered by Accent Group's FY25 modern slavery statement: 67 suppliers across 80 factories make its own brands, 90% of them in China; no living wage commitment. View

Sources and actions

Sources 6

Show all 6 sources
  1. Accent Group - Good Shopping Guide (ethical.org.au) · search the archive · 2026 Ethical Fashion Report: Accent Group scored 10/100 (average 31.5); Lulu & Rose listed as an Accent brand
  2. Accent Group reshapes retail network for growth (Inside Retail) · search the archive · Aug 2026 FY26 results: closure of Glue completed; Nude Lucy led new store openings with record sales and profit

Published by Lulu & Rose or its owner

  1. Accent Group Modern Slavery Statement FY25 · search the archive · 67 own-brand suppliers, 80 factories, 90% in China; all Tier 1 factories audited; findings on hours and machine guards
  2. Accent Group Modern Slavery Statement FY22 · search the archive · Lulu & Rose acquired with Glue Store in April 2021; own-brand factories mostly in China (71 of 80)
  3. Accent Group Modern Slavery Statement FY24 · search the archive · 78 approved factories, 92% in China; SA8000-aligned audits required; no living wage commitment
  4. Lulu & Rose - Accent Group · search the archive · Contemporary women's label in Accent Group's brand portfolio; no sourcing information

Company details

Headquarters
Australia
Last researched
2 November 2026
Cite this page
Labour Lens, "Is Lulu & Rose ethical? Labour rating", https://www.labourlens.net/brand/lulu-and-rose, last researched 2 November 2026, accessed [date].
Method
Researched with AI assistance against published rules. How we check · What Lacks transparency means

Better-graded everyday fashion

Something missing or wrong?

Grades are opinions based on the evidence listed here. Send us evidence, or a right of reply if you represent Lulu & Rose.