Jigsaw
Lacks transparency. Publishes some details, but doesn't show its workers are paid and treated fairly.
Last researched 3 November 2026 · 5 sources
London brand selling women's and men's clothing and knitwear.
We couldn't confirm where Jigsaw makes most of its mid-priced women's and men's fashion.
Also worth knowing
Most clothes and shoes are made in countries such as China and Bangladesh, where pay is usually below a living wage and unions are heavily restricted.
Better-graded everyday fashion
Graded higher than Jigsaw, selling the same kinds of things. Second-hand first.
Second-hand and refurbished goods create no new factory work, so they're Good by rule and come first.
Know something we've missed? Send evidence. Represent Jigsaw? Send a right of reply.
Compare Jigsaw with another brand
Why it's graded Lacks transparency
- Not met: Meets 1 of 6 Good requirements.
- Holds the grade back: It has 2 red flags: no evidence of a living wage and unaudited production, probably in high-risk countries. Two or more red flags means a poor grade.
- It isn't Harm on record, because there's no serious confirmed problem on its record.
- Lacks transparency is still a poor grade: in supply chains like this, workers who can't be seen to be treated fairly are usually underpaid or unprotected.
Good requirements 1 of 6
- Not met: Pays a living wage, or holds a strong fair-pay certificationLiving wage: no evidence
- Not met: Respects worker rightsWhere clothes and shoes are usually made, such as China and Bangladesh, unions are heavily restricted, and it has no full supply chain audit.
- Not met: Supply chain independently audited or certified, or at least 80% made in countries with strong labour standards
- Met: No child or forced labour findings or links
- Not met: Names the factories or farms that make its products, or is fully certified by a scheme that holds and audits that list
- Not met: High-risk raw materials (cotton, leather, silk and cashmere) traced or certified, or not a major part of its rangeNot traced or certified: cotton
Red flags 2
- Red flag: No evidence it pays a living wage
- Red flag: Probably made mostly in countries with poor worker rights, without a full independent audit of its supply chain
Stars it would earn as Good
None yet. Stars only show on Good companies. About stars
Where it's made
We couldn't confirm where Jigsaw makes most of its products, so this shows where clothes and shoes are usually made.
| Country | Share | Worker rights | Legal minimum wage | Forced labour risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| China | 30% | No guarantee of rights | Below a living wage | Moderate |
| Bangladesh | 20% | No guarantee of rights | Far below a living wage | Moderate |
| Vietnam | 15% | Systematic violations | Well below a living wage | Moderate |
| India | 10% | No guarantee of rights | Well below a living wage | High |
| Cambodia | 8% | No guarantee of rights | Far below a living wage | Moderate |
| Türkiye | 7% | No guarantee of rights | Below a living wage | Very high |
| Indonesia | 5% | No guarantee of rights | Well below a living wage | Moderate |
| Pakistan | 5% | No guarantee of rights | Far below a living wage | High |
Evidence
What we found
- Modern slavery statement
- Doesn't show where its cotton comes from. Cotton is linked to forced labour in Xinjiang and Turkmenistan, and child labour in several growing regions, so it can't be graded Good until it traces or certifies it.
- Uses leather, silk and cashmere in only a few products. It doesn't show where its leather and silk come from and traces or certifies most of its cashmere. That doesn't count against it for Good, but the "Open supply chain" star needs all of them traced, certified or upcycled.
Research notes Jigsaw names China, India, Portugal, Spain and Turkey among the more than 10 countries where its 40 suppliers and 66 factories are, but publishes no factory list or country shares. Its supplier code is based on the ETI Base Code, including living wages, and suppliers must join Sedex and be audited within a year, but no audit results or wage data are published. Its cashmere is traced to Otog Banner in Inner Mongolia via the spinner Consinee; core T-shirts use Supima cotton and leather comes from unnamed accredited tanneries. No labour abuse findings linked to Jigsaw were found.
What independent sources say
| Source | Result | Details |
|---|---|---|
| UK Modern Slavery Statement Registry | Listed | Publishes a UK slavery and human trafficking statement: 40 suppliers and 66 factories (35 clothing, 31 accessories) in more than 10 countries. View |
| Baptist World Aid Ethical Fashion Report | Not covered | Not assessed in the 2026 Ethical Fashion Report, which covers companies with a large Australian or New Zealand presence; Jigsaw has left Australia. View |
| Fashion Transparency Index (Fashion Revolution) | Not covered | Not in the 2023 Fashion Transparency Index, which covers brands with turnover above US$400 million. View |
Sources and actions
Sources 5
Show all 5 sources
- Jigsaw has left Australia (Ragtrader) · search the archive · Jigsaw withdrew its Australian stores and concessions
- Jigsaw brand page (Next Australia) · search the archive · Jigsaw clothing sold online to Australia through Next's Australian site
Published by Jigsaw or its owner
- Slavery and Human Trafficking Statement (Jigsaw) · search the archive · 40 suppliers, 66 factories in over 10 countries incl. China, India, Portugal, Spain, Turkey; ETI-based code; Sedex audits
- Sourcing Principles (Jigsaw) · search the archive · Wages at least legal minimum or industry benchmark; approved audit partners and Sedex; no factory list
- Our Materials (Jigsaw) · search the archive · Cashmere traced to Otog Banner, Inner Mongolia via Consinee; silk lines; Supima cotton; leather from accredited tanneries
Company details
- Headquarters
- United Kingdom
- Last researched
- 3 November 2026
- Cite this page
- Labour Lens, "Is Jigsaw ethical? Labour rating", https://www.labourlens.net/brand/jigsaw, last researched 3 November 2026, accessed [date].
- Method
- Researched with AI assistance against published rules. How we check · What Lacks transparency means
Something missing or wrong?
Grades are opinions based on the evidence listed here. Send us evidence, or a right of reply if you represent Jigsaw.
