Labour Lens

Lacks transparency. Publishes some details, but doesn't show its workers are paid and treated fairly.

Last researched 23 October 2026 · 6 sources

German canned herring and mackerel brand owned by Thai Union's Rügen Fisch.

Until Hawesta traces its fish and seafood to the boat or farm and has the conditions of the people who catch or farm it checked independently, it can't show that they are free and fairly paid.

Know something we've missed? Send evidence. Represent Hawesta? Send a right of reply.

Compare Hawesta with another brand

Why it's graded Lacks transparency

  • Not met: Meets 3 of 7 Good requirements.
  • Holds the grade back: It relies on fish and seafood that it can't trace to the boat or farm. That alone means a poor grade until it takes steps to trace it and check the conditions of the people who catch or farm it.
  • It isn't Harm on record, because there's no serious confirmed problem on its record.
  • Lacks transparency is still a poor grade: in supply chains like this, workers who can't be seen to be treated fairly are usually unprotected.

How grades are decided


Good requirements 3 of 7

  • Met: Pays a living wage, or holds a strong fair-pay certificationLiving wage: presumed because legal wages in Germany are about a living wage, not checked at the company
  • Met: Respects worker rights
  • Not met: Supply chain independently audited or certified, or at least 80% made in countries with strong labour standards
  • Not met: Shows where its earlier production stages happen, not just the final oneA "Made in" claim can cover only the final stage. Earlier stages to show: catching or farming the fish and seafood
  • Met: No child or forced labour findings or links
  • Not met: Names the factories or farms that make its products, or is fully certified by a scheme that holds and audits that list
  • Not met: Traces its catch to the boat or farm and has crews' or farm workers' conditions checked independently

Red flags 2

  • Red flag: Hidden supply chain: no certification, independent audits or supplier list
  • Red flag: Relies on fish and seafood it can't trace to the boat or farm
  • Red flag: Fails its category's raw-material check (means Lacks transparency)

Stars it would earn as Good

None yet. Stars only show on Good companies. About stars

Where it's made

Germany has the largest share, 95%. Thailand is next, at 5%.

Where it's made, share by country, and conditions there
CountryShareWorker rightsLegal minimum wageForced labour risk
Germany95%Strong protectionsAbout a living wageLow
Thailand5%No guarantee of rightsBelow a living wageModerate

Evidence

What we found

  • Risk across the industry, not a finding about this company: fishing fleets and processing plants have some of the worst documented forced labour, including trafficked crews held at sea for years.
  • Makes part of its range in its own factories
  • "Made in Germany" only means the last major stage happened there: under customs and consumer law, catching or farming the fish and seafood can be made elsewhere. It hasn't shown where those earlier stages happen, so where it's made counts towards On Track but not Good.
  • Relies on fish and seafood from fishing boats and farms, where crews and farm workers, often migrants recruited into debt, have been held for months or years, beaten and denied pay, out of reach of factory audits. It hasn't shown any steps to trace its fish and seafood to the boat or farm or have the conditions of the people who catch or farm it checked, so it's graded Lacks transparency until it does.

Research notes Hawesta was taken over by Rügen Fisch in 2009, and Thai Union bought a majority of Rügen Fisch in 2015. In 2022 it announced the closure of Hawesta's Lübeck plant and the move of production to Rügen Fisch's own plant in Sassnitz, Germany. Herring is about 95% of volume; tuna arrives cleaned and pre-cooked from Thai Union in Bangkok and comes from the PNA fishery in the Pacific. Hawesta is recognised by MSC for its certified herring range, but no share of the whole range is given. It names no fishing vessels and reports no independent crew checks.

What independent sources say

SourceResultDetails
Business & Human Rights Resource CentreProblem foundThe Resource Centre carries the 2015 AP investigation into slave-peeled shrimp and owner Thai Union's response. View

Sources and actions

Sources 6

Show all 6 sources
  1. AP: Global supermarkets selling shrimp peeled by slaves (Business & Human Rights Resource Centre, 2015) · search the archive · AP found shrimp peeled by people held in Thai sheds; Thai Union said it would bring processing in-house and give jobs to affected workers
  2. Thai Union's Rügen Fisch to close seafood cannery in Germany (SeafoodSource, 2022) · search the archive · Thai Union bought a majority of Rügen Fisch in 2015; Hawesta is its subsidiary; production moves to Sassnitz
  3. Hawesta to close Lübeck plant and transfer operations to Sassnitz (Thai Union, 2022) · search the archive · Hawesta, a Rügen Fisch subsidiary in the Thai Union portfolio, closes its Lübeck plant and moves production to Rügen Fisch's Sassnitz site; 200 Lübeck staff
  4. Hawesta: Innovating Canned Fish with MSC-Certified Tuna & Herring Products (Food Chain Magazine) · search the archive · Herring about 95% of production volume; tuna pre-cooked in Bangkok by Thai Union, from the PNA fishery; Rügen Fisch took over Hawesta in 2009
  5. Our Brands (Thai Union) · search the archive · Hawesta listed among Thai Union's European brands; range of herring, mackerel and tuna
  6. MSC Small Pelagic Yearbook 2026 (DACH) · search the archive · Hawesta named among leaders in MSC certified herring assortments and won an MSC DACH Herring Award in 2025

Company details

Headquarters
Germany
Last researched
23 October 2026
Cite this page
Labour Lens, "Is Hawesta ethical? Labour rating", https://www.labourlens.net/brand/hawesta, last researched 23 October 2026, accessed [date].
Method
Researched with AI assistance against published rules. How we check · What Lacks transparency means

Other canned and pouched fish brands

Nothing we've rated in canned and pouched fish is better than Lacks transparency yet.

See every canned and pouched fish brand

Something missing or wrong?

Grades are opinions based on the evidence listed here. Send us evidence, or a right of reply if you represent Hawesta.