Labour Lens

Estée Lauder

Lacks transparency

Lacks transparency. Publishes some details, but doesn't show its workers are paid and treated fairly.

Last researched 3 November 2026 · 6 sources

Prestige skincare and make-up brand of US group Estée Lauder Companies.

Until Estée Lauder switches to synthetic mica or traces its natural mica to mines that are checked independently, it can't show that children don't dig it.

Also worth knowing

Estée Lauder's supply chain was linked to child labour in 2024, which it has only partly acted on.

Know something we've missed? Send evidence. Represent Estée Lauder? Send a right of reply.

Compare Estée Lauder with another brand

Why it's graded Lacks transparency

  • Not met: Meets 1 of 6 Good requirements.
  • Holds the grade back: It uses natural mica that it can't trace. That alone means a poor grade until it switches to synthetic mica or takes steps to trace it to the mine.
  • It isn't Harm on record: the most serious problem on its record (child labour link, last recorded in 2024) was a link through a supplier, which the company has only partly acted on.
  • Lacks transparency is still a poor grade: in supply chains like this, workers who can't be seen to be treated fairly are usually underpaid or unprotected.

How grades are decided


Good requirements 1 of 6

  • Not met: Pays a living wage, or holds a strong fair-pay certificationLiving wage: no evidence
  • Met: Respects worker rights
  • Not met: Supply chain independently audited or certified, or at least 80% made in countries with strong labour standards
  • Not met: No child or forced labour findings or links
  • Not met: Names the factories or farms that make its products, or is fully certified by a scheme that holds and audits that list
  • Not met: Uses only synthetic mica or none, or traces natural mica to independently checked mines, and traces or certifies other high-risk ingredients (palm oil) where they're a major part of its range

Red flags 3

  • Red flag: No evidence it pays a living wage
  • Red flag: Forced, slave or child labour found in or linked to its supply chain
  • Red flag: Uses natural mica it can't trace to the mine
  • Red flag: Fails its category's raw-material check (means Lacks transparency)

Stars it would earn as Good

None yet. Stars only show on Good companies. About stars

Where it's made

These are its parent group's countries across all its brands; Estée Lauder doesn't say where its own products are made. The rest is shown as where beauty and personal care products are usually made.

Where it's made, and conditions there
CountryWorker rightsLegal minimum wageForced labour risk
United StatesSystematic violationsBelow a living wageLow
JapanStrong protectionsClose to a living wageLow
United KingdomRegular violationsClose to a living wageLow
BelgiumRegular violationsAbout a living wageLow
CanadaRegular violationsAbout a living wageLow
SwitzerlandRegular violationsAbout a living wageLow
AustraliaUsual for the industryStrong protectionsAbout a living wageLow
FranceUsual for the industryRegular violationsAbout a living wageLow
ChinaUsual for the industryNo guarantee of rightsBelow a living wageModerate
ThailandUsual for the industryNo guarantee of rightsBelow a living wageModerate
ItalyUsual for the industryStrong protectionsClose to a living wageLow
South KoreaUsual for the industryNo guarantee of rightsClose to a living wageLow
GermanyUsual for the industryStrong protectionsAbout a living wageLow
SpainUsual for the industryStrong protectionsClose to a living wageLow
IndonesiaUsual for the industryNo guarantee of rightsWell below a living wageModerate
IndiaUsual for the industryNo guarantee of rightsWell below a living wageHigh

Evidence

What we found

  • Risk across the industry, not a finding about this company: mica is dug partly by children in India and Madagascar, and the palm-oil ingredients in soaps, shampoos and creams come from plantations on the US list for forced and child labour. Carnauba wax, jasmine and vanilla add slave-like work and child labour on farms.
  • Makes part of its range in its own factories
  • Modern slavery statement
  • Traces or certifies most but not all of its palm oil. That doesn't count against it for Good, but the "Open supply chain" star needs all of it traced, certified or upcycled.
  • Uses natural mica, much of it dug by hand in illegal or unregulated mines in India and Madagascar, where children work and pits collapse. It hasn't shown any steps on its mica, such as switching to synthetic mica, joining the Responsible Mica Initiative or tracing it to the mine, so it's graded Lacks transparency until it does. Source

Research notes Estée Lauder products are made mainly in the group's own plants in the United States, Belgium, Switzerland, Japan, the UK and Canada, plus third-party makers it doesn't name or count; Estée Lauder Australia makes nothing here and ships from a Singapore hub. The group's palm ingredients are all RSPO certified, 97% through physical supply chains (2024), but it doesn't say how much mica its make-up uses or where it comes from, beyond a child-labour programme in Jharkhand and Bihar, and isn't confirmed as a Responsible Mica Initiative member. It audits higher-risk suppliers through third parties and reports compliance gaps in hours and wages (FY2025), but publishes no supplier list and no living wage commitment.

What independent sources say

SourceResultDetails
Australian Modern Slavery RegisterListedEstee Lauder Pty. Limited lodges modern slavery statements; its FY2022 statement says it makes nothing in Australia and ships from a Singapore hub supplied by group plants in North America and Europe and approved third-party makers. View

Confirmed issues 1

Only confirmed problems are listed, and old ones drop off after 10 to 15 years. A problem the company has fully put right no longer counts against it, and nor does one it finds and is fixing itself. How problems are counted

Last recordedWhat happenedMade amends?
2024Link through a supplierA BBC investigation (2024) found children picking jasmine in Egypt for suppliers of Aerin, an Estée Lauder Companies brand, working at night; the group said it does not source fragrance ingredients directly and was acting with its suppliers (Euronews, 2024). Source · search the archivePartlyThe group said it was investigating with its suppliers and joined the Harvesting the Future coalition for Egyptian jasmine, with training and protective equipment for pickers.

Sources and actions

Sources 6

Show all 6 sources
  1. Estee Lauder Pty. Limited modern slavery statement FY2022 (Modern Slavery Register) · search the archive · Australian entity makes nothing in Australia; finished goods shipped from Singapore hub supplied by company plants in North America and Europe or approved third-party makers
  2. Luxury perfumes from Lancôme and Aerin linked to child labour (Euronews, 2024) · search the archive · BBC found children picking jasmine in Egypt for suppliers of Lancôme and Aerin (an Estée Lauder Companies brand); company responses
  3. 2025 Enterprise Modern Slavery Statement (Estée Lauder Companies) · search the archive · Manufactures primarily in own facilities in the US, Belgium, Switzerland, Japan, UK and Canada plus third-party makers; risk-ranked third-party audits; FY2025 findings on hours, wages and safety; Egyptian jasmine response
  4. Modern Slavery (Estée Lauder Companies) · search the archive · Same manufacturing countries; findings in health and safety, environment, working hours and wages in fiscal 2025; no audit counts
  5. Palm oil (Estée Lauder Companies) · search the archive · 100% of palm-based ingredients RSPO certified since 2015; 97% from physical supply chains in 2024; traceability to the mill is a plan
  6. Responsible Sourcing (Estée Lauder Companies) · search the archive · Partnership with Kailash Satyarthi Children's Foundation on child labour in mica mining in Jharkhand and Bihar since 2005; no mica tracing or membership of the Responsible Mica Initiative stated

Company details

Headquarters
United States
Last researched
3 November 2026
Cite this page
Labour Lens, "Is Estée Lauder ethical? Labour rating", https://www.labourlens.net/brand/estee-lauder, last researched 3 November 2026, accessed [date].
Method
Researched with AI assistance against published rules. How we check · What Lacks transparency means

Other skincare and sunscreen brands

Nothing we've rated in skincare and sunscreen is better than Lacks transparency yet.

See every skincare and sunscreen brand

Something missing or wrong?

Grades are opinions based on the evidence listed here. Send us evidence, or a right of reply if you represent Estée Lauder.