Labour Lens

David Lawrence

Lacks transparency

Lacks transparency. Publishes some details, but doesn't show its workers are paid and treated fairly.

Last researched 2 November 2026 · 6 sources

Australian women's label selling dresses, tailoring and knitwear.

David Lawrence's parent, Myer Holdings, scored 20/100 in the 2026 Ethical Fashion Report, and there's no proof it pays more than the legal minimum, which in China is below a living wage.

Know something we've missed? Send evidence. Represent David Lawrence? Send a right of reply.

Compare David Lawrence with another brand

Why it's graded Lacks transparency

  • Not met: Meets 2 of 6 Good requirements.
  • Holds the grade back: It has 3 red flags: no evidence of a living wage, unaudited production in high-risk countries and a failing or very low rating (Ethical Fashion Report 20/100 in 2026, for the company it's rated with). Two or more red flags means a poor grade.
  • It isn't Harm on record, because there's no serious confirmed problem on its record.
  • Lacks transparency is still a poor grade: in supply chains like this, workers who can't be seen to be treated fairly are usually underpaid or unprotected.

How grades are decided


Good requirements 2 of 6

  • Not met: Pays a living wage, or holds a strong fair-pay certificationLiving wage: no evidence
  • Not met: Respects worker rights96% of its products are made in countries such as China and India, where unions are heavily restricted, and it has no full supply chain audit.
  • Not met: Supply chain independently audited or certified, or at least 80% made in countries with strong labour standards
  • Met: No child or forced labour findings or links
  • Met: Names the factories or farms that make its products, or is fully certified by a scheme that holds and audits that listPublishes its supplier list
  • Not met: High-risk raw materials (cotton) traced or certified, or not a major part of its rangeNot traced or certified: cotton

Red flags 3

  • Red flag: No evidence it pays a living wage
  • Red flag: Made mostly in countries with poor worker rights, without a full independent audit of its supply chain
  • Red flag: Failing or very low score on an independent rating: Ethical Fashion Report 20/100 (2026, the company it's rated with)

Stars it would earn as Good

None yet. Stars only show on Good companies. About stars

Where it's made

From Myer Holdings' supplier list, which covers David Lawrence and its sister brands. David Lawrence publishes no breakdown of its own, so these are group-wide shares. The rest is shown as where clothes and shoes are usually made.

Where it's made, share by country, and conditions there
CountryShareWorker rightsLegal minimum wageForced labour risk
China78%No guarantee of rightsBelow a living wageModerate
India10%No guarantee of rightsWell below a living wageHigh
Bangladesh8%No guarantee of rightsFar below a living wageModerate
Vietnam4%Systematic violationsWell below a living wageModerate
CambodiaUsual for the industryunder 1%No guarantee of rightsFar below a living wageModerate
TürkiyeUsual for the industryunder 1%No guarantee of rightsBelow a living wageVery high
IndonesiaUsual for the industryunder 1%No guarantee of rightsWell below a living wageModerate
PakistanUsual for the industryunder 1%No guarantee of rightsFar below a living wageHigh

Evidence

What we found

  • Publishes supplier list
  • Modern slavery statement
  • Doesn't show where its cotton comes from. Cotton is linked to forced labour in Xinjiang and Turkmenistan, and child labour in several growing regions, so it can't be graded Good until it traces or certifies it.

Research notes David Lawrence is still a Myer-owned label; Myer put it up for sale in 2024 but kept it. Its clothes are made by outside suppliers within Myer's private-brand supply chain, which by spend is 77% China, 10% India, 7% Bangladesh and 3% Vietnam; these shares are Myer-wide, as no David Lawrence-only figures are published. Myer publishes a factory list and reviews SMETA/BSCI-style audits, but its wage gap analysis found most factories pay minimum wage or more yet below a living wage, especially in China, and it has no dated living wage target.

What independent sources say

SourceResultDetails
Baptist World Aid Ethical Fashion ReportProblem foundOwner Myer Holdings scored 20 out of 100 in the 2026 Ethical Fashion Report (average 31.5), after 19 in 2024. View
Australian Modern Slavery RegisterListedCovered by Myer's FY25 modern slavery statement (Marcs David Lawrence Pty Ltd is a Myer Retail entity); no modern slavery cases reported, 57 high-risk audit issues, mostly excessive overtime. View

Sources and actions

Sources 6

Show all 6 sources
  1. Shop Ethical: Myer Holdings Ltd · search the archive · 2026 Ethical Fashion Report: Myer Holdings scored 20/100 (average 31.5); David Lawrence listed among Myer brands
  2. Myer acquires Marcs, David Lawrence (Ragtrader, 2017) · search the archive · Myer bought the David Lawrence brand, IP and stock out of voluntary administration in April 2017
  3. Myer profits slashed (The New Daily, 2024) · search the archive · Sale of the three labels stopped; Myer kept them
  4. Myer is divesting in 3 privately-owned labels (IADS, 2024) · search the archive · Marcs, David Lawrence and sass & bide put up for sale via KPMG in February 2024

Published by David Lawrence or its owner

  1. Myer Modern Slavery Statement 2025 · search the archive · Marcs David Lawrence Pty Ltd in Myer Retail; private brand spend China 77%, India 10%, Bangladesh 7%, Vietnam 3%; audits; wage gap analysis
  2. David Lawrence at Myer · search the archive · David Lawrence still sold in 2026: about 840 women's clothing and accessory lines

Company details

Headquarters
Australia
Last researched
2 November 2026
Cite this page
Labour Lens, "Is David Lawrence ethical? Labour rating", https://www.labourlens.net/brand/david-lawrence, last researched 2 November 2026, accessed [date].
Method
Researched with AI assistance against published rules. How we check · What Lacks transparency means

Other suits and tailoring brands

Nothing we've rated in suits and tailoring is better than Lacks transparency yet.

See every suits and tailoring brand

Something missing or wrong?

Grades are opinions based on the evidence listed here. Send us evidence, or a right of reply if you represent David Lawrence.