Labour Lens

Lacks transparency. Publishes some details, but doesn't show its workers are paid and treated fairly.

Last researched 3 November 2026 · 5 sources

US brand of slow cookers, pressure cookers and multi-cookers.

There's no proof Crock-Pot pays more than the legal minimum, which in China is below a living wage, and it has no full independent audit.

Know something we've missed? Send evidence. Represent Crock-Pot? Send a right of reply.

Compare Crock-Pot with another brand

Why it's graded Lacks transparency

  • Not met: Meets 2 of 6 Good requirements.
  • Holds the grade back: It doesn't show that workers are paid a living wage, and isn't certified as working towards one. On Track needs at least one of these.
  • It isn't Harm on record, because there's no serious confirmed problem on its record.
  • Lacks transparency is still a poor grade: in supply chains like this, workers who can't be seen to be treated fairly are usually underpaid or unprotected.

How grades are decided


Good requirements 2 of 6

  • Not met: Pays a living wage, or holds a strong fair-pay certificationLiving wage: no evidence
  • Not met: Respects worker rightsMost of its products are made in countries such as China and India, where unions are heavily restricted, and it has no full supply chain audit.
  • Not met: Supply chain independently audited or certified, or at least 80% made in countries with strong labour standards
  • Met: No child or forced labour findings or links
  • Not met: Names the factories or farms that make its products, or is fully certified by a scheme that holds and audits that list
  • Met: High-risk raw materials (such as timber and cotton) traced or certified, or not a major part of its rangeNone recorded in a major share of its range

Red flags 2

  • Red flag: No evidence it pays a living wage
  • Red flag: Made mostly in countries with poor worker rights, without a full independent audit of its supply chain

Stars it would earn as Good

None yet. Stars only show on Good companies. About stars

Where it's made

From product labels; Crock-Pot doesn't say where its products are made. The rest is shown as where homewares and appliances are usually made.

Where it's made, and conditions there
CountryWorker rightsLegal minimum wageForced labour risk
ChinaNo guarantee of rightsBelow a living wageModerate
VietnamUsual for the industrySystematic violationsWell below a living wageModerate
IndiaUsual for the industryNo guarantee of rightsWell below a living wageHigh
PolandUsual for the industryRegular violationsClose to a living wageModerate
IndonesiaUsual for the industryNo guarantee of rightsWell below a living wageModerate
MalaysiaUsual for the industryNo guarantee of rightsBelow a living wageModerate

Evidence

What we found

  • No high-risk raw materials (such as timber and cotton) are recorded in a major share of its range, so the raw-material check doesn't hold it back for Good.
  • Modern slavery statement

Research notes Crock-Pot cookers are made by contract suppliers, with Newell product data listing China as country of origin; in 2024 Newell said it was moving some countertop appliance production out of China, naming Vietnam, Thailand and Indonesia as possible sources, but it gives no shares or factory list. Newell's 2025 statement reports 396 social audits, no confirmed forced labour and five action plans on migrant labour and recruitment fees, and names small appliances as high risk. Its code asks suppliers only to follow local wage laws, with no supplier list or living wage commitment.

What independent sources say

SourceResultDetails
Australian Modern Slavery RegisterListedNewell Australia Pty Limited is a reporting entity in Newell Brands' 2025 joint modern slavery statement. View
UK Modern Slavery Statement RegistryListedNewell Brands publishes a modern slavery statement for 2025 (approved May 2026) covering its brands, including Australian entity Newell Australia Pty Limited. View
Baptist World Aid Ethical Fashion ReportNot coveredNot assessed in Baptist World Aid's Ethical Fashion or Electronics reports, which do not cover kitchen appliance makers. View
Business & Human Rights Resource CentreListedBusiness & Human Rights Resource Centre profile for Newell Brands lists no labour allegations or response requests. View
Corporate Human Rights Benchmark (World Benchmarking Alliance)Not coveredNewell Brands' household goods sector is not among the sectors assessed in the 2026 Corporate Human Rights Benchmark. View

Sources and actions

Sources 5

Show all 5 sources
  1. Newell Brands Modern Slavery Statement 2025 (Australian register) · search the archive · Newell Australia reporting entity; 18,000 suppliers in 90+ countries; 396 social audits; 5 recruitment fee action plans; small appliances high risk
  2. Newell moving some electrics production out of China (HomePage News, 2024) · search the archive · 2024: Newell moving some countertop appliance production out of China; Vietnam, Thailand and Indonesia named only as possible sources
  3. Crockpot Programmable 6-Quart Slow Cooker with Sous Vide (Newell product data) · search the archive · Country of origin listed as China
  4. Slow Cookers & Pressure Cookers (The Good Guys) · search the archive · Crock-Pot slow cookers and Express multi-cookers sold online only by The Good Guys in Australia

Published by Crock-Pot or its owner

  1. Modern Slavery and Supply Chain Transparency Statement 2025 (Newell Brands) · search the archive · No confirmed forced labour in 2025; suppliers must follow applicable wage laws; no supplier list

Company details

Headquarters
United States
Last researched
3 November 2026
Cite this page
Labour Lens, "Is Crock-Pot ethical? Labour rating", https://www.labourlens.net/brand/crock-pot, last researched 3 November 2026, accessed [date].
Method
Researched with AI assistance against published rules. How we check · What Lacks transparency means

Better-graded appliances

Something missing or wrong?

Grades are opinions based on the evidence listed here. Send us evidence, or a right of reply if you represent Crock-Pot.