AllSaints
Lacks transparency. Publishes some details, but doesn't show its workers are paid and treated fairly.
Last researched 2 November 2026 · 3 sources
London label selling clothing, leather jackets, footwear and accessories.
AllSaints can't show that the workers who make its products in Indonesia and India earn a living wage, which workers there are very unlikely to.
Know something we've missed? Send evidence. Represent AllSaints? Send a right of reply.
Compare AllSaints with another brand
Why it's graded Lacks transparency
- Not met: Meets 2 of 6 Good requirements.
- Holds the grade back: It doesn't show that workers are paid a living wage, and isn't certified as working towards one. On Track needs at least one of these.
- It isn't Harm on record, because there's no serious confirmed problem on its record.
- Lacks transparency is still a poor grade: in supply chains like this, workers who can't be seen to be treated fairly are usually underpaid or unprotected.
Good requirements 2 of 6
- Not met: Pays a living wage, or holds a strong fair-pay certificationLiving wage: no evidence
- Not met: Respects worker rightsJudged on where its products are made: worker rights are poorly protected in China, Indonesia and India.
- Met: Supply chain independently audited or certified, or at least 80% made in countries with strong labour standards
- Met: No child or forced labour findings or links
- Not met: Names the factories or farms that make its products, or is fully certified by a scheme that holds and audits that list
- Not met: High-risk raw materials (cotton and leather) traced or certified, or not a major part of its rangeNot traced or certified: leather
Red flags 1
- Red flag: No evidence it pays a living wage
Stars it would earn as Good
None yet. Stars only show on Good companies. About stars
Where it's made
AllSaints says which countries it makes its products in, but doesn't name the factories.
| Country | Worker rights | Legal minimum wage | Forced labour risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bulgaria | Regular violations | Below a living wage | High |
| China | No guarantee of rights | Below a living wage | Moderate |
| Spain | Strong protections | Close to a living wage | Low |
| United Kingdom | Regular violations | Close to a living wage | Low |
| Indonesia | No guarantee of rights | Well below a living wage | Moderate |
| India | No guarantee of rights | Well below a living wage | High |
| Cambodia | No guarantee of rights | Far below a living wage | Moderate |
| Mexico | Regular violations | Below a living wage | Moderate |
| Peru | Systematic violations | Well below a living wage | Moderate |
| Philippines | No guarantee of rights | Well below a living wage | Moderate |
| Poland | Regular violations | Close to a living wage | Moderate |
| Portugal | Strong protections | Close to a living wage | Low |
| Romania | Regular violations | Below a living wage | Moderate |
| Thailand | No guarantee of rights | Below a living wage | Moderate |
| Türkiye | No guarantee of rights | Below a living wage | Very high |
| Vietnam | Systematic violations | Well below a living wage | Moderate |
Evidence
What we found
- Modern slavery statement
- Independent social audits of all its main factories
- Doesn't show where its leather comes from. Leather is linked to hazardous tannery work and forced labour on some cattle ranches, so it can't be graded Good until it traces or certifies it.
- Traces or certifies most but not all of its cotton. That doesn't count against it for Good, but the "Open supply chain" star needs all of it traced, certified or upcycled.
Research notes AllSaints owns no factories. Its FY2024/25 statement lists 175 Tier 1 sites run by 51 suppliers in Bulgaria, Cambodia, China, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Peru, the Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Spain, Thailand, Turkey, the UK and Vietnam, with no shares by country. Every direct Tier 1 site needs a third-party social audit from the past year; it moved from Sedex to amfori in 2023. It has not yet published a factory list (promised for end of 2026) and has no living wage commitment. About 95% of its cotton is traced by transaction certificates; it is an LWG member but gives no leather sourcing figures.
What independent sources say
| Source | Result | Details |
|---|---|---|
| UK Modern Slavery Statement Registry | Listed | Publishes an annual UK modern slavery statement; the FY2024/25 statement covers 175 Tier 1 sites in 16 countries and requires a recent third-party social audit for every direct Tier 1 site. View |
| Baptist World Aid Ethical Fashion Report | Not listed | AllSaints was not assessed in the 2026 Ethical Fashion Report. View |
Sources and actions
Sources 3
Show all 3 sources
Published by AllSaints or its owner
- AllSaints Modern Slavery Statement 2024/25 · search the archive · 175 Tier 1 sites, 51 suppliers, 16 countries; third-party audits required; amfori member; 95% cotton traceable; Tier 1 list promised end 2026
- AllSaints Modern Slavery Statement FY22-23 · search the archive · Owns no factories; 149 Tier 1 sites; left Sedex and joined amfori in 2023; LWG certification renewed
- AllSaints Product Hub (sustainability) · search the archive · Leather Working Group member; GOTS organic cotton and RWS wool lines certified by IDFL
Company details
- Headquarters
- United Kingdom
- Employees
- About 2,000
- Last researched
- 2 November 2026
- Cite this page
- Labour Lens, "Is AllSaints ethical? Labour rating", https://www.labourlens.net/brand/allsaints, last researched 2 November 2026, accessed [date].
- Method
- Researched with AI assistance against published rules. How we check · What Lacks transparency means
Better-graded everyday fashion
Second-hand and refurbished goods create no new factory work, so they're Good by rule and come first.
Something missing or wrong?
Grades are opinions based on the evidence listed here. Send us evidence, or a right of reply if you represent AllSaints.