Labour Lens
Coffee · Specialty coffee roaster and cafés

St Ali

Partly verified

St Ali isn't doing enough to protect workers: there's no proof workers earn a living wage, and unions and workers' rights are heavily restricted in Brazil and Honduras. It does have some safeguards, as workers or farmers share in ownership.

Last researched 8 October 2026

Not doing enough. Workers in the supply chain are likely underpaid, unprotected or in danger, and in the worst cases face forced or child labour. Look for a better-graded alternative. What this grade means

Send evidenceRepresent St Ali? Reply here

Good: 1 of 5

  • Pays a living wage
  • Respects worker rights
  • Full supply chain audit, or made only in countries with rigorous labour standards
  • No child or forced labour findings
  • Publishes where its products are made (supplier list, named farms or its own factories)

Great: 1 of 3

  • Pays beyond a living wage
  • Finds and fixes problems, or invests directly in workers' communities
  • Actively empowers workers

Needs all Good requirements plus two of these.

Red flags: 1

  • Hidden or unaudited supply chain (no certification or documentation, or major production in countries with poor worker rights without independent audits)

Where it's made

CountryWorker rightsLegal wagesForced labour risk
Brazil 32%Systematic violationsBelow a living wageModerate
Honduras 22%Systematic violationsWell below a living wageModerate
Colombia 16%Systematic violationsWell below a living wageModerate
India 5%Systematic violationsWell below a living wageHigh
Peru 5%Regular violationsWell below a living wageLow
China 4%Systematic violationsBelow a living wageModerate
Ethiopia 4%Regular violationsFar below a living wageModerate
Kenya 4%Regular violationsWell below a living wageModerate
Indonesia 4%Systematic violationsWell below a living wageModerate
Uganda 4%Regular violationsFar below a living wageModerate

Country conditions from the ITUC Global Rights Index, Global Slavery Index and living wage benchmarks. Certifications and audits can raise a company above its countries' baseline.

Why this grade

  • Coffee is on the US Department of Labor child or forced labour list for over a dozen countries, and farm-gate prices often fall below a living income. (partly offset by certification or direct sourcing)
  • Direct trade (self-reported)
  • Worker or farmer owned

ST. ALi is a Melbourne specialty roaster that says it is wholly owned by its employees, from senior managers to delivery staff, and has no parent company; its staff numbers are not published. It says it has been "an industry leader in direct relationships with farmers" since 2005 and agrees prices with producers where possible, but does not publish the prices paid, a list of farms or a transparency report. Its blends, including the flagship Orthodox (50% Colombia, 50% Brazil), name countries but not farms, apart from one Brazilian estate; only its few rotating single origins from Honduras and Costa Rica name the farm or producer. Production shares are estimated from the current product range by counting each product's origins (using stated blend percentages where given), not from purchase

What independent sources say

SourceResultDetails
B Corp directoryNot listedST. ALi is not a Certified B Corp. View ↗
Fairtrade (incl. FLOCERT and Fairtrade ANZ)Not listedST. ALi coffee is not Fairtrade certified. View ↗
Australian Modern Slavery RegisterUnclearNo modern slavery statement is published; the company is likely below the A$100m revenue threshold for mandatory reporting. View ↗
Business & Human Rights Resource CentreUnclearNo published allegations involving ST. ALi. View ↗
Headquarters
Australia

Sources (12)

Last researched 8 October 2026 · details still being verified. Grades are opinions based on the evidence listed here. Represent this company and think something is wrong? A right-of-reply form is coming soon.